Optimal design for a psychosocial intervention on severely acute malnourished children in humanitarian settings: results of an expert survey [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]

• Published in: F1000 research Vol. 10; p. 1073
• Main Authors: N'DIAYE, Dieynaba S, Salpéteur, Cécile, Bizouerne, Cécile, Le Roch, Karine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: Expert survey; severe acute malnutrition; psychosocial intervention; children
• ISSN: 2046-1402; 2046-1402
• DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.55416.1

Background: Common psychosocial interventions focus on feeding, stimulation, emotional responsiveness and childcare and parenting. Inclusion of such a component in the outpatient management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) children is recommended. However, clinical assessment of such interventions is tedious in humanitarian settings and modalities evidence on the impact of psychosocial interventions alongside nutrition protocol for SAM is scarce.  This survey aimed to gather expert opinions on the optimal design of a combined psychosocial and nutrition intervention feasible in humanitarian settings. Methods: From March to May 2018, an online survey was emailed to international experts in nutrition and mental health and psychosocial support, mainly from academia and international non-governmental organisations (INGOs). It included multiple choices questions on the key components of an optimal combined intervention. Results: Of the 76 experts targeted, 20 responded. 11 (55%) belonged to INGOs, 2 (10%) to academia, and 4 (20%) to international organizations and donors. For most respondents, a combined intervention should be provided in weekly 45-minuites counselling sessions, provided individually (rather than in a group) and at home (rather than at a health center). None of the proposed ideal duration (two, four or six months) gained the majority of votes. Experts thought that 35% staff training should be in "Active listening for psychosocial support", and 30% in "Early child development", 25% in "Maternal depression" and 9% in "Anthropometric measurements". They estimated that a combined intervention could improve SAM recovery rate by 10% (min-max: 0-19%) vs. the nutritional protocol alone. Qualitative results highlighted the importance of tailoring the intervention to the individual, the population and the settings; as well as considering feasibility and scalability at the design stage. Conclusion: These findings could guide further research on the impact of psychosocial interventions on SAM children's health and development, and help designing innovative approaches to treat undernutrition.