Can the world’s largest pension fund, Japan’s GPIF, be a responsible steward? Stewardship responsibility as asset owner

The number of institutional investors has seen a marked increase in the past few decades. For the purpose of the long-term economic success of portfolio companies, it is crucial to encourage investee companies to establish better corporate governance structure within them. The U.K. and Japan introdu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Governance and Regulation Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 44 - 52
Main Author Otsuka, Akio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The number of institutional investors has seen a marked increase in the past few decades. For the purpose of the long-term economic success of portfolio companies, it is crucial to encourage investee companies to establish better corporate governance structure within them. The U.K. and Japan introduced the Stewardship Code, and the Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) of Japan defines itself to fulfill its roles and responsibilities as an asset owner in line with Japan’s Stewardship Code. However, passive funds that have occupied a large share of the market have no financial incentive to incur the costs for engagement with investee companies. The purpose of this article is to review the two Stewardship Codes, the stewardship structure, policies of the GPIF that has accepted Japan’s Stewardship Code, and to explore how the GPIF fulfills its stewardship responsibility, based on the Japan’s Code, requires its external asset managers to comply with its stewardship principles and continuously monitors the stewardship activities of asset managers. The findings are that continually improving stewardship and engagement by utilizing the PDCA cycle, the GPIF can be a responsible steward in the Japanese market.
ISSN:2220-9352
2306-6784
DOI:10.22495/jgrv9i1art4