Comparison of meta-heuristic algorithms for fuzzy modelling of COVID-19 illness’ severity classification

The world health organization (WHO) proclaimed the COVID-19, commonly known as the coronavirus disease 2019, was a pandemic in March 2020. When people are in close proximity to one another, the virus spreads mostly through the air. It causes some symptoms in the affected person. COVID-19 symptoms ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 50
Main Authors Mohamad Aseri, Nur Azieta, Ismail, Mohd Arfian, Fakharudin, Abdul Sahli, Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman, Kasim, Shahreen, Zakaria, Noor Hidayah, Sutikno, Tole
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Yogyakarta IAES Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The world health organization (WHO) proclaimed the COVID-19, commonly known as the coronavirus disease 2019, was a pandemic in March 2020. When people are in close proximity to one another, the virus spreads mostly through the air. It causes some symptoms in the affected person. COVID-19 symptoms are quite variable, ranging from none to severe sickness. As a result, the fuzzy method is seen favourably as a tool for determining the severity of a person’s COVID-19 sickness. However, when applied to a large situation, manually generating a fuzzy parameter is challenging. This could be because of the identification of a large number of fuzzy parameters. A mechanism, such as an automatic procedure, is consequently required to identify the right fuzzy parameters. The metaheuristic algorithm is regarded as a viable strategy. Five meta-heuristic algorithms were analyzed and utilized in this article to classify the severity of COVID-19 sickness data. The performance of the five meta-heuristic algorithms was evaluated using the COVID-19 symptoms dataset. The COVID-19 symptom dataset was created in accordance with WHO and the Indian ministry of health and family welfare criteria. The findings provide the average classification accuracy for each approach.
ISSN:2089-4872
2252-8938
2089-4872
DOI:10.11591/ijai.v11.i1.pp50-64