Acute Postdialysis Changes in Plasma ICAM-1 and IL-1 Levels in Hemodialysis Patients

Fifty subjects: 20 controls and 30 hemodialysis patients were included in the study. The acute changes in plasma ICAM‐1 and IL‐1β levels immediately after dialysis were evaluated using two types of membranes and two types of dialysate. The predialysis ICAM‐1 level in the whole patients was significa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHemodialysis international Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 73 - 104
Main Authors EL-Hefeni, S, Moghazy, T, Ragab, M, Khalil, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.02.2003
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fifty subjects: 20 controls and 30 hemodialysis patients were included in the study. The acute changes in plasma ICAM‐1 and IL‐1β levels immediately after dialysis were evaluated using two types of membranes and two types of dialysate. The predialysis ICAM‐1 level in the whole patients was significantly higher than controls, while that of IL‐1β was significantly lower. The postdialysis ICAM‐1 showed insignificant higher level than the predialysis one, while that of IL‐1β showed significant higher level than both the predialysis and control levels. Both postdialysis ICAM‐1 and IL‐1β levels in patients using cuprophane membrane (bioincompatible) showed insignificant higher levels than in those using polysulfone one (biocompatible). The percent increase in ICAM‐1 level did not significantly differ in these two subgroups, while the percent increase in IL‐1β level showed significantly higher value in those using bioincompatible membrane (108%) than that in those using biocompatible membrane (44%). No significant difference in the levels of either ICAM‐1 or IL‐1β were found between patients using acetate and bicarbonate dialysate. Conclusion: the bioincompatibility of the membrane is the important factor in the occurrence of the acute reaction during hemodialysis.
Bibliography:istex:706FC2C5C9C88F49434677FDF982BF4B82DF5470
ArticleID:HDI012_59
ark:/67375/WNG-8X2G422L-V
ISSN:1492-7535
1542-4758
DOI:10.1046/j.1492-7535.2003.01259.x