O.1.3-2 Development and implementation of physical activity policies at national and subnational levels: a pilot study in Latin American countries

• Published in: European journal of public health Vol. 33; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Grueso, Juliana Mejía, Pratt, Michael, Resendiz, Eugen, Cruz, Gloria Isabel Niño, Gómez, Nubia Yaneth Ruiz, Gómez, Rafael Alexander Leandro, Sánchez, Inés Revuelta, Vargas, Gerardo Alonso Araya, Avilés, Angélica María Ochoa, Jáuregui, Alejandra, Salvo, Deborah, Varela, Andrea Ramírez
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 11.09.2023
• Subjects: Parallel sessions
• ISSN: 1101-1262; 1464-360X
• DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.099

Abstract Purpose National physical activity (PA) policy processes are only beginning to be documented, and the interaction between the actors involved in these processes remains understudied. This study was designed to gain further insights into the policy process (agenda setting, policy formulation, adoption, implementation, evaluation) and the interaction between national and subnational levels. Methods We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility and scalability of an instrument to assess the PA policy process as part of the work of the Global Physical Activity Observatory (GoPA!). The instrument was tested in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Mexico, where pilot data were collected in matched pairs of the capital plus one non-capital city among national and subnational policy makers (n = 24), as identified by the GoPA! Country Contacts. Descriptive statistics were calculated to assess perceptions on the influences and interactions across the two levels with respect to PA policy development, implementation, and evaluation. Results Twenty-two (response rate=85.7%) key informants provided data, mostly from the health sector (54.5%), followed by sports (27.3%), education (9.1%), and transport (9.1%) government institutions. Most participants reported that their countries have a current PA policy embedded within a noncommunicable diseases prevention plan (50.0%), other plan (41.7%), or a plan to prevent, manage, or control obesity (8.3%). Respondents at the subnational level rated PA promotion as central (75.0%), while at the national level the role was important but not central (75.0%). Across the five stages of the policy process, national and subnational policy makers reported low-to-little involvement in the other level’s PA policy processes. Conclusions This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of collecting national and subnational PA policy data across countries with the active collaboration of the GoPA! network Country Contacts. Also, we successfully identified the degree of interaction between government levels throughout the PA policy process. Initial results suggest that engagement between national and subnational levels is suboptimal. Funding Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia; University of California San Diego, USA.