Corrigendum to “Relation Between a Social Welfare Function and the Gini Index of Income Inequality” Journal of Economic Theory 4 (1972): 98-100

Fifty years ago Eytan Sheshinski constructed a composite measure of social welfare in which income per capita enters positively, and income inequality enters negatively: social welfare was defined as a strictly increasing function of the product of income per capita and one minus the Gini coefficien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of economic theory Vol. 206; p. 105543
Main Author Stark, Oded
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fifty years ago Eytan Sheshinski constructed a composite measure of social welfare in which income per capita enters positively, and income inequality enters negatively: social welfare was defined as a strictly increasing function of the product of income per capita and one minus the Gini coefficient. In the case of a population of two persons whose incomes are distinct, Sheshinski states that social welfare depends only on the lower income, which reduces the social welfare function to the Rawlsian social welfare function. We show that this is not true: social welfare depends on both incomes, and there is no congruence with the Rawlsian perspective.
Bibliography:erratum
ISSN:0022-0531
1095-7235
DOI:10.1016/j.jet.2022.105543