Isatuximab Plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) in Real-Life Context in France: IMAGE Subgroup Analysis Based on Prior Lines of Therapy and Refractory Status in Anti-CD38-Naïve Population

Introduction: Isatuximab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), targets a specific CD38 epitope to induce myeloma cell death. Based on the results of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study, isatuximab (Isa) plus pomalidomide (P) and dexamethasone (d; Isa-Pd) is approved in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refrac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBlood Vol. 142; no. Supplement 1; p. 7419
Main Authors Leleu, Xavier, Fontan, Jean, Perrot, Aurore, Karlin, Lionel, Touzeau, Cyrille, Schulmann, Samantha, Manier, Salomon, Belhadj Merzoug, Karim, Trebouet, Adrien, Zunic, Patricia, Schiano De Colella, Jean Marc, Tekle, Christina, Gaucher, Marianne, Decaux, Olivier
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 02.11.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: Isatuximab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), targets a specific CD38 epitope to induce myeloma cell death. Based on the results of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study, isatuximab (Isa) plus pomalidomide (P) and dexamethasone (d; Isa-Pd) is approved in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received ≥2 prior therapies. Prior to Isa-Pd regulatory approval, Isa was available in France under early access programs (EAPs). IMAGE is a non-interventional, retrospective cohort study of pts treated with Isa-Pd under the French EAPs. In the IMAGE overall effectiveness population (median follow-up 14.2 months [mo]), median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 12.4 mo; overall response rate (ORR) was 46.3%; 27.9% of pts achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) and best response was VGPR for 60.3% of pts. In the current myeloma landscape, not all pts with RRMM have received a prior anti-CD38 mAb, particularly where access is difficult; thus, the real-world effectiveness of Isa in daratumumab (dara)-naïve pts needs to be assessed in light of the Phase 3 APOLLO and ICARIA-MM trials investigating dara-Pd and Isa-Pd in dara-naïve populations. Effectiveness results from the IMAGE subgroup analysis of dara-exposed and -refractory pts have been presented previously. Here, we describe results for dara-naïve pts based on prior lines of therapy (LOT) and lenalidomide (len)-refractory status. Methods: Data were collected from medical records of adult pts with RRMM who received ≥1 dose of Isa under the EAPs from 29 Jul 2019-1 Sep 2020. The effectiveness analysis was restricted to pts with ≥1 year of follow-up after Isa initiation. PFS was defined as the time from Isa-Pd initiation to date of disease progression or death. VGPR was defined as a ≥90% reduction in serum or urine M-protein, or in the difference between involved and non-involved free light chain. The description of adverse events (AEs; verbatim) was recorded as a reason for treatment temporary or permanent discontinuation or dose reduction. Data were recorded per the subject's medical file. No specific grading was performed. Results: The safety population included 299 pts who received ≥1 Isa dose under the EAPs; of these, 294 received ≥1 Isa dose and met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, thus comprising the effectiveness population. Within the overall effectiveness population, 216 (73.5%) pts were dara-naïve; among them, 13.4%, 58.8%, and 27.8% received 1, 2, and ≥3 prior LOT, respectively; 72.2% were len-refractory (median 2 prior LOT); and 54.2% were len-refractory at last prior LOT. At a median follow-up of 14.2 mo, mPFS (95% CI) in dara-naïve pts was not reached (NR; 14.6-NR), 15.0 mo (10.6-NR), and 14.8 mo (7.6-NR) with 1, 2, and ≥3 prior LOT, respectively; 13.2 mo (9.0-18.6) in those refractory to len; and 13.2 (9.0-NR) in those refractory to len at last prior LOT. ORR (of which, VGPR) was 41.4% (17.2%), 52.0% (34.6%), and 50.0% (31.7%) in pts with 1, 2, and ≥3 prior LOT, respectively; 49.4% (29.5%) in len-refractory pts; and 50.4% (29.9%) in len-refractory at last prior LOT pts (Table). At least 1 AE was reported in 53 (24.4%) pts in the dara-naïve safety population (n=217): 7 (24.1%), 32 (25.2%), and 14 (23.0%) in the 1, 2, and ≥3 prior LOT subgroups, respectively; 41 (26.1%) in the len-refractory subgroup; and 32 (27.4%) in the len-refractory at last prior LOT subgroup. AEs led to permanent Isa discontinuation in 3 (2.4%) pts with 2 prior LOT; 3 (1.9%) len-refractory pts; and 2 (1.7%) len-refractory at last prior LOT pts. The most common AEs were blood and lymphatic system disorders, occurring in 39 (18.0%) pts. Infections and infestations were reported in 2 (0.9%) pts: 1 had received 1 prior LOT and 1 had 2 prior LOT; both pts were len-refractory at last prior LOT. Conclusions: In the dara-naïve populations from APOLLO (dara-Pd) and ICARIA-MM (Isa-Pd), mPFS was 12.4 and 11.1 mo, respectively. This subgroup analysis of IMAGE provides real-world evidence of Isa effectiveness in dara-naïve subgroups: Isa-Pd demonstrated a high mPFS of 16.6 mo in dara-naïve pts and meaningful mPFS at first and subsequent relapse, including in difficult-to-treat len-refractory pts; mPFS was generally comparable to that of the overall effectiveness population. No new safety signals were observed compared with ICARIA-MM. However, the incidence of some AEs like infections was low, possibly due to the retrospective nature of the study. Funding: Sanofi. Leleu:Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Harpoon Therapeutics: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria. Perrot:Abbvie, Adaptive, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria. Karlin:AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Takeda: Consultancy. Touzeau:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manier:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene/BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria. Belhadj Merzoug:BMS: Research Funding; Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda: Other: Travel Support. Zunic:Abbvie, Janssen, Sanofi: Other: Travel Support. Schiano De Colella:Pfizer, Amgen: Other: Accomodation; Janssen, Sanofi, GSK, Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tekle:Sanofi: Current Employment. Gaucher:Sanofi: Current Employment. Decaux:Janssen, BMS, GSK, Sanofi, Takeda, Roche, Gilead: Honoraria. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2023-179532