P.067 The decision to revascularize in symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease: results from the Hot Carotid Qualitative study

• Published in: Canadian journal of neurological sciences Vol. 50; no. s2; pp. S76 - S77
• Main Authors: MacLean, D, Beland, B, Jewett, G, Bartolini, L, Campbell, DJ, Varma, M, Singh, R, Al-Sultan, A, Wong, J, Menon, B, Ganesh, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.06.2023
• Subjects: Abstracts; Canadian Stroke Consortium (CSC); Decision making; Poster Presentations; Qualitative research
• ISSN: 0317-1671; 2057-0155
• DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2023.170

Background: Little evidence exists to guide the management of symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC). SyNC, which refers to carotid lesions with less than 50% artery stenosis, has been increasingly implicated as a cause of stroke and TIA. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 22 stroke physicians from 16 centers were conducted as part of the Hot Carotid Qualitative Study. This study explored decision-making approaches, opinions and attitudes regarding the management of symptomatic carotid disease. Presented here are a subset of results related to the decision to revascularize patients with SyNC. Results: Thematic analysis revealed equipoise in the decision to revascularize patients with SyNC. Participants discussed a desire to use imaging features (e.g plaque rupture and plaque morphology) to inform the decision to revascularize, though significant uncertainty remains in appraising the risk conferred by certain features. Experts support further study to better understand the use of these features in risk appraisal for patients with SyNC. Conclusions: The decision to revascularize patients with SyNC is an area with significant equipoise. Experts identify the use of imaging features as an important tool in informing the decision to pursue revascularization in patients with SyNC though more study is required in this area to better inform practice.