T × W Completeness
T × W logic is a combination of tense and modal logic for worlds or histories with the same time order. It is the basis for logics of causation, agency and conditionals, and therefore an important tool for philosophical logic. Semantically it has been defined, among others, by R. H. Thomason. Using...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of philosophical logic Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 241 - 250 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Reidel Pub. Co
01.06.1997
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | T × W logic is a combination of tense and modal logic for worlds or histories with the same time order. It is the basis for logics of causation, agency and conditionals, and therefore an important tool for philosophical logic. Semantically it has been defined, among others, by R. H. Thomason. Using an operator expressing truth in all worlds, first discussed by C. M. Di Maio and A. Zanardo, an axiomatization is given and its completeness proved via D. Gabbay's irreflexivity lemma. Given this lemma the proof is more or less straight forward. At the end an alternative axiomatization is sketched in which Di Maio's and Zanardo's operator is replaced by a version of "actually". |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3611 1573-0433 |
DOI: | 10.1023/A:1017942520078 |