Safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia

To investigate the safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia. Data of acute ischemic stroke patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 and a platelet count <100×10 /L were obtained from a multicent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZhejiang da xue xue bao. Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences. Yi xue ban Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 175 - 183
Main Authors XU, Dongjuan, ZHOU, Huan, HU, Mengmeng, SHEN, Yilei, LI, Hongfei, WEI, Lianyan, XU, Jing, JIANG, Zhuangzhuang, SHAO, Xiaoli, XI, Zhenhua, HE, Songbin, LOU, Min, KE, Shaofa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China 25.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1008-9292
DOI10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0423

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To investigate the safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia. Data of acute ischemic stroke patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 and a platelet count <100×10 /L were obtained from a multicenter register. Those who required anticoagulation or had other contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was a 1-year all-cause death. The short-term neurological outcomes were evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at discharge. A total of 1868 non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Multivariate regression analyses showed that mono-antiplatelet therapy significantly increased the proportion of mRS score of 0-1 at discharge ( =1.657, 95% : 1.253-2.192, <0.01) and did not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage ( =2.359, 95% : 0.301-18.503, >0.05), compared with those without antiplatelet therapy. However, dual-antiplatelet therapy did not bring more neurological benefits ( =0.923, 95% : 0.690-1.234, >0.05), but increased the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding ( =2.837, 95% : 1.311-6.136, <0.01) compared with those with mono-antiplatelet therapy. For patients with platelet counts ≤75×10 /L and >90×10 /L, antiplatelet therapy significantly improved neurological functional outcomes (both <0.05). For those with platelet counts (>75-90)×10 /L, antiplatelet therapy resulted in a significant improvement of 1-year survival ( <0.05). For patients even with concurrent coagulation abnormalities, mono-antiplatelet therapy did not increase the risk of various types of bleeding (all >0.05) but improved neurological functional outcomes (all <0.01). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of bleeding events, 1-year all-cause mortality risk, and neurological functional outcomes between aspirin and clopidogrel (all >0.05). For non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia, antiplatelet therapy remains a reasonable choice. Mono-antiplatelet therapy has the same efficiency as dual-antiplatelet therapy in neurological outcome improvement with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1008-9292
DOI:10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0423