Seven year follow up of subclinical rheumatic disease using WHF criteria

Abstract Background The prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is higher using echocardiographic screening compared with clinical examination. It is proven that clinical screening underestimates the prevalence, but it still remains the cornerstone for the purpose of intervention. Echocardiograp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal Vol. 44; no. Supplement_2
Main Authors Bhaya, M, Choudhary, D, Gupta, J, Panwar, R B, Panwar, V, Gupta, B K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 09.11.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background The prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is higher using echocardiographic screening compared with clinical examination. It is proven that clinical screening underestimates the prevalence, but it still remains the cornerstone for the purpose of intervention. Echocardiography can identify subclinical RHD and can be used for subclinical cases and to see progression /regression on follow up. Follow-up data of children with subclinical lesions are very much needed before implementing large scale screening programs in endemic regions. We are submitting the 7 year follow up data for subclinical RHD who were on RF prophylaxis. Method A total of 3000 school going children were screened echocardiographically during November 2015 to December 2018 for subclinical rheumatic heart disease using WHF criteria. Subjects with subclinical rheumatic heart disease were given prophylaxis for rheumatic fever in form of injection Benzathine penicillin or oral penicillin or tablet erythromycin depending upon tolerance and acceptance. These cases were followed up at 2-year and 7-year for echocardiographic evaluation and compliance to the prophylaxis. Results Out of 3000 cases screened, 114 were found to be having subclinical rheumatic heart disease. 39 subjects turned up for 2-year follow up and 13 subjects turned up for 7-year follow up(Table 1). All 13 were on rheumatic fever prophylaxis. 23% ( 3 out of 13) turned to be with normal echocardiography findings using WHF 2012 criteria. Limitation: Children who were not taking prophylaxis were not evaluated echocardiographically, therefore comparison could not be done. Conclusion Our study shows screening of school going children by echocardiography can detect subclinical rheumatic heart disease and rheumatic fever prophylaxis in such cases can results in reversion of the lesion and prevention of progression of RHD.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.1727