PO-0923 Varicocele Treatment In Paediatric Age: Report Of Different Techniques

BackgroundVaricocele is the first andrological disease in adolescent male. The aim of this study is to report our experience in varicocele treatment in paediatric age.Materials and methodsWe analysed patients treated with different techniques between January 2005 and January 2013. Inclusion criteria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of disease in childhood Vol. 99; no. Suppl 2; p. A551
Main Authors Zampieri, N, Mantovani, A, Scirè, G, Zambaldo, S, Zampieri, G, Camoglio, FS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.10.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundVaricocele is the first andrological disease in adolescent male. The aim of this study is to report our experience in varicocele treatment in paediatric age.Materials and methodsWe analysed patients treated with different techniques between January 2005 and January 2013. Inclusion criteria for the study were created. Patients were treated with different techniques based on the type of spermatic vein reflux detected on Doppler velocimetry. Type I spermatic vein reflux mini-invasive approaches, type II and III vein reflux open approaches. The following rates were considered as study endpoints: hydrocele rate; rate of relapses; rate of persistence; rate of testicular atrophy.ResultsDuring the study period 522 surgical varicocelectomies were performed. 345 cases were treated with videolaparoscopy (66,1%), 115 cases with an open inguinal technique (22,1%), 47 cases (9%) received a subinguinal technique (trans-scrotal technique in 18 cases and subinguinal technique in 29 cases) and 15 cases (2,8%) were treated with the one-trocar transumbilical technique.The laparoscopic technique and the subinguinal techniques showed a lower rate of hydrocele. Laparoscopic technique had less rate of relapses.ConclusionsThe laparoscopic techniques had less rate of relapses respect to other technique; this results could be related to the technique chosen respect to the type of spermatic vein reflux.
ISSN:0003-9888
1468-2044
DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1542