Where o’ where did my baseball cards go?
On the surface, baseball cards appear to be little more than uninteresting object of child's play; yet they provide invaluable data for assessing unique aspects of the social order. They reveal much about the state of society when they were produced and the people who collected them. This paper...
Saved in:
Published in | The Social science journal (Fort Collins) Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 742 - 750 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | On the surface, baseball cards appear to be little more than uninteresting object of child's play; yet they provide invaluable data for assessing unique aspects of the social order. They reveal much about the state of society when they were produced and the people who collected them. This paper examines the unique
numbering system the Topps company developed to differentiate among the “royalty of the diamond” from 1956 to 1980. Their system assigned to each card in a set a number that explicitly designated its placement, while implicitly establishing a hierarchical ordering among the players, ostensibly based on performance. It is arguable whether the numbering system Topps developed was based on performance or the ascribed characteristic of race. The results of our work suggest that player performance,
not race, was the primary factor in the assignment of “prestigious” card numbers in Topps’ system. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0362-3319 1873-5355 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.soscij.2007.10.009 |