Student Perceptions Of The First Course In Accounting: Majors Versus Non-Majors

This paper contributes to the continuing debate regarding the curriculum for the first undergraduate course in accounting by examining student perceptions from studying such a course. Participants are divided into two cohorts - Accounting & Finance Majors (AFM) and Other Business Majors (OBM). R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of business education Vol. 5; no. 5; pp. 501 - 514
Main Authors Tickell, Geoffrey, Lim, Tiong Kiong, Balachandran, Balasinghan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Littleton The Clute Institute 01.09.2012
Clute Institute
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper contributes to the continuing debate regarding the curriculum for the first undergraduate course in accounting by examining student perceptions from studying such a course. Participants are divided into two cohorts - Accounting & Finance Majors (AFM) and Other Business Majors (OBM). Results reported in this paper indicate that teaching the introductory accounting course from a users' perspective is likely to engender a more favorable impression from students than teaching from a preparers' perspective. Findings indicate that the AFM cohort holds significantly more positive attitudes to the first course in accounting than does its OBM counterpart. Furthermore, AFM student perceptions do not change between the beginning and the end of the course. In contrast, the OBM students respond less favorably at the end of the course than at the beginning. Findings underscore the difficulty of developing a first course in accounting that is interesting, useful and challenging to accounting and non-accounting majors. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:1942-2504
1942-2512
DOI:10.19030/ajbe.v5i5.7206