P916 Off-label dose escalation of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients. Incidence rate, timing, dosing patterns and outcomes
Abstract Background In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), after intravenous induction,Ustekinumab (UST) is administered as maintenance 90 mg every 8 (Q8) or 12 weeks (Q12) subcutaneously. As with other biological drugs, dose intensification may be effective after inadequate response or...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Crohn's and colitis Vol. 18; no. Supplement_1; p. i1672 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
24.01.2024
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
Background
In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), after intravenous induction,Ustekinumab (UST) is administered as maintenance 90 mg every 8 (Q8) or 12 weeks (Q12) subcutaneously. As with other biological drugs, dose intensification may be effective after inadequate response or loss of response. However, different dosing regimens have been used and the best strategy is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and efficacy of UST off-label dose escalation in IBD.
Methods
We performed an observational cohort study in 2 hospitals in Vigo,Spain. All patients who started UST between 1 June 2017 and 31 December 2022 to control their active IBD were enrolled. The primary endpoints were incidence rate and outcomes of UST off-label dose intensification. Secondary endpoints were the timing of dose escalation and the patterns indicated.
Results
1
173 IBD patients received UST: females 53.8% (93), mean age 49.7(15.5) years, Crohn´s disease 82% (142), previous anti-TNF 93.6% (162) and vedolizumab 22.5% (39) (Table 1). Subcutaneous UST was maintained Q8 in 63.6% (110) and Q12 in 34.7% (60). Baseline activity data were higher in Q8 patients (p=0.001). At 16 week 23 patients (13.3%) had no response, but 9 (39.1%) became late responders at 6 months. Of the 173 IBD patients included, 38.2% and 30.6 % achieved clinical response and clinical remission at 1 year.
Dose escalation was performed in 32.4% (56) with different patterns: 54.5% Q4 (30), 21.8% reinduction plus Q4 (12), 12.7% Q6 (7) and 10.9% only intravenous reinduction (6). The timing of dose escalation was: before 6 months in 19.6% (11), at 12 months 42.8% (24) and at 2 years 73.2% (41). Response and remission were achieved in 28.6% (16) and 41.1% (23) after dose escalation respectively. In 6.4% of the patients (11) a second dose escalation was indicated. Neither previous anti-TNF or vedolizumab nor concomitant use of steroids at starting UST were associated to dose escalation. IBD patients that were initially scheduled to receive subcutaneous UST Q12 needed less dosing escalation (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Off-label UST dose escalation was frequent and effective in achieving response in IBD patients. The schemes of dose-escalation were heterogeneous between the participants. Patients initially scheduled Q12 due to lower inflammatory activity required less dose escalation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-9946 1876-4479 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.1046 |