Impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SLGT2) inhibitors treatment initiation on the reduction of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implanted cardiac devices

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 44; no. Supplement_2
• Main Authors: Minguito Carazo, C, Sanchez Munoz, E, Martinez Sande, J L, Rodriguez Manero, M, Fidalgo Andres, M L, Garcia Seara, J, Fernandez Lopez, X A, Gonzalez Rebollo, J M, Gonzalez Ferrero, T, Rodriguez Santamarta, M, Gonzalez Melchor, L, Martinon Martinez, J, Garcia Rodeja, F, Fernandez Vazquez, F, Gonzalez Juanatey, J R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 09.11.2023
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.336

Abstract Introduction Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SLGT2) inhibitors have demonstrated benefits on survival and hospital admissions in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. However, their impact on the burden of ventricular (VA) and atrial arrhythmias (AA) is unknown. Methods Retrospective multicentric study of heart failure patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator device (ICD) from 2015 to 2020 with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. Device-registered arrhythmic events were analyzed and compared during one year following SLGT2 inhibitor initiation and during one year before initiation. Relevant VA were defined as the occurrence of any sustained VT (SVT) (>30 seconds), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or appropriate therapy (antytachycardia pacing or shock). All VA included all the relevant VA and the occurrence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). AA included atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, and episodes of more than 24 hour of AF. Results 147 patients (67 ± 10 years, 82.3% males, LVEF 30.3 ± 11%, CRT 39.3%), were included in the study. 77.6% had complete remote tele-monitoring during the entire follow up and there was no difference in the antiarrhythmic therapy between the two periods. Following SGLT2 inhibitor initiation, there was a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with relevant VA (19.7% pre vs 10.9% post; p=0.019) and all VA (47.6% pre vs 30.6% post; p<0.001) (Figure 1 and 2). There was a reduction in the prevalence of NSVT (40.1% pre vs. 27.2% post; p<0.001), of SVT (17.7% vs 8.8%; p<0.001), of VF (4.1% vs 2%; p=NS) and appropriate therapies (14.3% vs 9.5%; p=NS). Among patients with any VA, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of NSVT (p<0.001), but not in the incidence of SVT or appropriate therapies (p=NS). There was no impact on atrial fibrillation burden or in the number of AF episodes lasting more than 24 hours (p=NS). Conclusions In our study, initiation of a SGLT2 inhibitor in patients with heart failure, was associated with a reduction in the prevalence of relevant VA and any VA, with a significant reduction in the number of NSVT per patient. There was no impact on AF burden or the number of AF episodes lasting more than 24 hours. Prospective studies should be performed to sustain these conclusions.Relevant ventricular arrhythmiasAny ventricular arrhythmia