Right ventricular dysfunction in the absence of pulmonary hypertension in HFpEF

Abstract Background Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), portends worse prognosis, and is believed to be caused by contractile impairment and remodeling due to afterload mismatch from pulmonary hypertension (PH). The goal of this stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal Vol. 44; no. Supplement_2
Main Authors Popovic, D, Alogna, A, Omar, M, Sorimachi, H, Kazunori, O, Reddy, Y N V, Borlaug, B A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 09.11.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), portends worse prognosis, and is believed to be caused by contractile impairment and remodeling due to afterload mismatch from pulmonary hypertension (PH). The goal of this study was to examine the right heart in patients with HFpEF and resting mean pulmonary arterial (PA) pressure (MPAP)≤20 mmHg. Methods and results Among 621 patients with HFpEF undergoing comprehensive echocardiography and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 159 (26%) had resting MPAP≤20 mmHg (HFpEFMPAP≤20mmHg). In comparison to 73 controls, they were more obese, had more coronary disease and atrial fibrillation. After adjusting for BMI, there were no differences in plasma volume but NTproBNP was higher and peak oxygen consumption lower in HFpEFMPAP≤20mmHg than in controls (p = 0.002, <0.001, respectively). While RV dimension was similar, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and RVs’ were lower in HFpEFMPAP≤20mmHg (18±5 vs. 22±4 mm, p = 0.005; 10±2 vs. 12±2 cm/s, p = 0.047, respectively). HFpEFMPAP≤20mmHg and controls displayed similar pulmonary vascular resistance, MPAP and right atrial pressure at rest, but during exercise, MPAP and right atrial pressure were higher in patients with HFpEFMPAP≤20mmHg (41±10 vs. 33±10 mmHg; 18±7 vs. 12±4 mmHg, p<0.001, respectively). PA compliance was lower at both rest and exercise (rest 4.1±2.1 vs. 5.0±1.8; exercise 2.9±1.4 vs. 3.2±1.4 ml/mmHg, p<0.001, for both). Conclusion Right heart dysfunction is present in patients with HFpEF even in the absence of frank PH. These patients display greater pulsatile RV loading by PA compliance even as resistance is not markedly elevated. These data support further study into novel therapies targeting pulsatile RV afterload in HFpEF.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.780