Both artistic and comic the status and significance of humour in the context of Louis Cazamian’s writings

This study examines Louis Cazamian’s considerations on the nature of humour, which were influenced by Bergson’s theory of the comic as a contrast between life and automatism and Bergson’s idea of humour as a specific type of comic linguistic transposition. In this context, the paper draws attention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of humour research Vol. 9; no. 4; pp. 74 - 90
Main Author Ševčík, Miloš
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Krakowskie Towarzystwo Popularyzowania Wiedzy o Komunikacji Językowej Tertium 2021
Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study examines Louis Cazamian’s considerations on the nature of humour, which were influenced by Bergson’s theory of the comic as a contrast between life and automatism and Bergson’s idea of humour as a specific type of comic linguistic transposition. In this context, the paper draws attention to the critical function of humour in Cazamian’s understanding based on his embracing of Bergson’s conception of laughter as a critique of the automation of life. However, Cazamian’s speculating diverges from Bergson’s thoughts on humour and leads to the creation of an elaborated theory. Cazamian states that humour has an artistic status and attributes characteristics to it that Bergson attributes to works of art. In contrast to Bergson, who emphasises the distinction between art and the comic, Cazamian deems humour’s critical aspect to accord with its artistic status. While humour is attributed artistic status because it suggests the multifaceted or elusive character of reality, humour’s comic character entails ridiculing the inability or unwillingness to respect that reality has a comic character.
ISSN:2307-700X
2307-700X
DOI:10.7592/EJHR2021.9.4.576