Electronic Surveillance and Social Stigma: Perspectives on People Monitoring in Brazil

This study seeks to assess the stigma caused by electronic monitoring of individuals and its impact on society. The problem guiding the research can be summarized in the following question: Can electronic monitoring be considered a form of social stigma? Based on data collected from a series of stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUkrainian policymaker (Online) Vol. 14; pp. 68 - 76
Main Authors Marcolla, Fernanda Analú, Wermuth, Maiquel Ângelo Dezordi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology (ISPC) 01.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study seeks to assess the stigma caused by electronic monitoring of individuals and its impact on society. The problem guiding the research can be summarized in the following question: Can electronic monitoring be considered a form of social stigma? Based on data collected from a series of studies conducted on the topic in the field of Law and Political Science, reflected in the bibliography that supports this study, it becomes possible to affirm that, like incarceration, electronic monitoring is also a form of stigmatizing the individual. Electronic monitoring is a tool that identifies the individual as someone who has committed a crime and, like all stigmas, it differentiates them from the rest of the population, thereby causing prejudices and other forms of discrimination. The general objective of the research is to assess how electronic monitoring generates stigmatized bodies in society. To give substance to the general objective, the specific objectives of the text, which are reflected in its structure in two sections, are: a) to evaluate, based on studies already conducted in the field of Law and Criminology, the concept of stigma and who the stigmatized people were throughout social evolution; b) to investigate how electronic monitoring is characterized by creating stigmatized bodies. The research method employed was hypothetical-deductive through the use of bibliographic and documentary research techniques.
ISSN:2617-2194
2617-2208
DOI:10.29202/up/14/7