A third (meta-)critique

I begin my third reply by answering some of the criticisms raised by Tierno against theodical attempts to account for the pervasiveness of moral evil. I then take the discussion to a meta-philosophical level, where I question the very way of thinking about God and evil implicit in Tierno's crit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSophia Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 139 - 142
Main Author Trakakis, Nick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Parkville Springer Nature B.V 01.10.2006
Subjects
Good & evil
Morality
Philosophy
Religion
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:I begin my third reply by answering some of the criticisms raised by Tierno against theodical attempts to account for the pervasiveness of moral evil. I then take the discussion to a meta-philosophical level, where I question the very way of thinking about God and evil implicit in Tierno's critique and in much contemporary philosophy of religion.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0038-1527
1873-930X
DOI:10.1007/BF02782489