Towards Estimating the Effect of SO3- Adsorption on the ORR in Pt (111)

Optimizing proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) performance is crucial in order to attain sustainable commercialization. A major part of the issue involves understanding the role of Nafion in the catalyst layer. Nafion’s behavior on bulk mode has been extensively reported in the literature, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMeeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society) Vol. MA2020-01; no. 46; p. 2618
Main Authors Salvado, Miguel Barreiros, Schott, Pascal, Guetaz, Laure, Gerard, Mathias, Bultel, Yann
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.05.2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Optimizing proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) performance is crucial in order to attain sustainable commercialization. A major part of the issue involves understanding the role of Nafion in the catalyst layer. Nafion’s behavior on bulk mode has been extensively reported in the literature, though on ultra-thin layer mode (<20nm) its structural arrangement which dictates the transport properties highly depends on the type of substrate interfacing [1]. In PEMFC catalyst layers, Nafion covers carbon-supported platinum aggregates on ultra-thin layer mode. In these composite layers, Nafion works as a binder for the aggregates, at the same time as it is meant to ensure pathways for protons and let arrive to the catalyst surface. At high current densities, a steep performance drop is usually observed in PEMFC operation. A part of this drop is reported to be due to activation losses as a doubling of the Tafel slope is observed [2]. The origin of this Tafel slope doubling has been subject of multiple studies. Understanding the causes requires understanding the phenomena occurring at the electrode/electrolyte interface. A technique which is commonly employed is cyclic voltammetry (CV) as it can provide insights regarding these interactions. Comparative CV studies on monocrystalline platinum Pt (111) in a PFSI solution and solution exhibit distinct features, where oxide formation appears to be inhibited at the beginning of this range for PFSI [3]. These CV studies coupled with electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) measurements showed that when extending the potential range to 1.4V and holding the potential at 1.1V (place-exchanged oxide formation range) a large mass gain at 0.5V emerges. The origin of these features is found to be due to strongly adsorbed sulfonate groups on the platinum surface. Other works validate this behavior [4], where sulfonate groups are found to be adsorbed in both the double layer region (0.4-0.5V) and in the hydroxyl adsorption region (0.6-0.85V). In this work, the continuum model proposed by Huang et al. [5] is coupled with a reaction framework comprising multistep mechanism [6]. The adsorption of SO3- is expected to follow a Langmuirian behavior [7], indicating that the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is hindered through site blocking. For the adsorption of on Pt(111) a single electron transfer mechanism is assumed [8]. Kinetic parameters are obtained by fitting the model’s response to experimental data as in [6]. The simulations allow quantifying the adsorption of sulfonate groups on the platinum surface and estimating its impact on the ORR. References: 1. A. Kusoglu, A.Z. Weber, Chemical Reviews, 117 : 987-1104 (2017). 2. P. Subramanian, T.A. Greszler, J. Zhang, W. Gu, R. Makharia, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 159(5) : B531-B540 (2012). 3. T. Masuda, F. Sonsudin, P.R. Singh, H. Naohara, K. Uosaki, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 117 : 15704-15709 (2013). 4. K. Kodama, R. Jinnouchi, T. Suzuki, H. Murata, T. Halanka, Y. Morimoto, Electrochemistry Communications, 36 : 26-28 (2013). 5. J. Huang, A. Malek, J. Zhang, M.H. Eikerling, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 120: 13587-13595 (2016). 6. B. Jayasankar, K. Karan, Electrochimica Acta, 273 : 367-378 (2018). 7. S.M. Andersen, Applied Catalysis B : Environmental, 181: 146-155 (2016). 8. K. Kodama, K. Motobayashi, A. Shinohara, N. Hasegawa, K. Kudo, R. Jinnouchi, M. Osawa, Y. Morimoto, ACS Catalysis, 8 : 694-700 (2018).
ISSN:2151-2043
2151-2035
DOI:10.1149/MA2020-01462618mtgabs