Application of Thealoz® duo eye drops confers novel protective effects on the ocular surface of dry eye patients

Purpose: The protective effect of Thealoz® Duo eye drops was investigated in patients with dry eye syndrome (DES) by clinical examination. Subsequently, the tear proteome alterations were characterized employing the mass spectrometry‐based proteomics platform. Methods: Fifty‐eight subjects underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) Vol. 100; no. S275
Main Authors Perumal, Natarajan, Jeong, Eunjin, Runde, Sarah, Manicam, Caroline, Pfeiffer, Norbert, Grus, Franz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: The protective effect of Thealoz® Duo eye drops was investigated in patients with dry eye syndrome (DES) by clinical examination. Subsequently, the tear proteome alterations were characterized employing the mass spectrometry‐based proteomics platform. Methods: Fifty‐eight subjects underwent thorough clinical investigation for DES, namely the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), and were grouped as mixed DES (DRY, N = 35) and healthy (CTRL, N = 23). A DRY subgroup of severe aqueous‐deficient DES (sDRYaq, N = 12) was also clinically identified. Only DES patients were subjected to application of Thealoz® Duo (trehalose 3% and hyaluronic acid 0.15%). All subjects were scheduled for clinical investigation before (day 0, T0) and after day 28 ± 4 (T28) and 56 ± 4 (T56) of Thealoz® Duo application. Next, 174 individual tear samples from both groups at two time‐points were subjected to in‐depth proteomics and bioinformatics analyses. Results: Application of Thealoz® Duo (4.2 ± 0.9 times/day) significantly improved the OSDI in DRY at T28 vs. T0 (p = 4.1 E‐3) and T56 vs. T0 (p = 2.0 E‐5). Proteomics analysis resulted in the identification of 128 and 291 significantly (p < 0.05) differently abundant proteins in DRY vs. CTRL and sDRYaq vs. CTRL, respectively. Interestingly, Thealoz® Duo application after only T28 resulted in significant activation of various molecular processes, mainly the antibacterial response (DRY vs. CTRL, p = 2.3 E‐4; sDRYaq vs. CTRL, p = 5.7 E‐5), metabolic pathways (DRY vs. CTRL, p = 4.9 E‐3; sDRYaq vs. CTRL, p = 4.7 E‐6) and inhibition of apoptosis (DRY vs. CTRL, p = 4.1 E‐4; sDRYaq vs. CTRL, p = 8.9 E‐17). Importantly, the activated inflammatory process at T0 in DRY (p = 9.7 E‐4) and sDRYaq (p = 2.0 E‐8) were significantly inhibited at T56 following the continuous use of Thealoz® Duo. Conclusions: For the first time, this comprehensive investigation unravelled novel mechanistic processes attributed to the efficacy of Thealoz® Duo eye drops, which significantly improved vision‐related functions in mixed and severe DES patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1755-375X
1755-3768
DOI:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2022.0256