Phase 3 Study Assessing Lot-to-Lot Consistency of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion Protein F3 Vaccine and Its Immune Response, Safety, and Reactogenicity When Co-administered With Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine

Abstract Background A single-dose investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, RSV prefusion protein F3 (RSVPreF3), was co-administered with a single-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-D-QIV) in a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter study in healthy, nonpregnant women ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases
Main Authors Chime, Nnenna, Anspach, Bruno, Jain, Vishal, Laajalahti, Outi, Ollinger, Thierry, Yaplee, Deborah, Kim, Joon Hyung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 05.07.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background A single-dose investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, RSV prefusion protein F3 (RSVPreF3), was co-administered with a single-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-D-QIV) in a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter study in healthy, nonpregnant women aged 18–49 years. Methods The study was observer-blind to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency of RSVPreF3, and single-blind to evaluate the immune response, safety, and reactogenicity of RSVPreF3 co-administered with FLU-D-QIV. Results A total of 1415 participants were included in the per-protocol set. There was a robust immune response at day 31 across each of the 3 RSVPreF3 vaccine lots; adjusted geometric mean concentration ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 1.01 (.91–1.12), 0.93 (.84–1.03), and 0.92 (.83–1.02) for RSV1/RSV2, RSV1/RSV3, and RSV2/RSV3, respectively. For FLU-D-QIV co-administered with RSVPreF3, versus FLU-D-QIV alone at day 31, noninferiority was satisfied for 3 of 4 strains assessed, with the lower limit of the 95% CI for geometric mean ratio >0.67. Conclusions Immunogenic consistency was demonstrated for 3 separate lots of RSVPreF3. Immunogenic noninferiority was demonstrated when comparing FLU-D-QIV administered alone, versus co-administered with RSVPreF3, for 3 strains of FLU-D-QIV. Co-administration was well tolerated, and both vaccines had clinically acceptable safety and reactogenicity profiles. Clinical Trials Registration NCT05045144; EudraCT 2021-000357-26.
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiae342