Acute neural response to cortisol as detected by functional connectivity analysis

Circulating cortisol exerts different functions within the stress homeostasis system: one is to modify neuronal response during or in the after math of stress (e.g. [1]), another is to provide central negative feedback to downregulate the tone of the HPA axis [2]. In this combined fMRI/endocrine stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmacopsychiatry
Main Authors Kiem, SA, Andrade, K, Spoormaker, VI, Holsboer, F, Czisch, M, Sämann, PG
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published 13.09.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Circulating cortisol exerts different functions within the stress homeostasis system: one is to modify neuronal response during or in the after math of stress (e.g. [1]), another is to provide central negative feedback to downregulate the tone of the HPA axis [2]. In this combined fMRI/endocrine study in 20 healthy males we compared effects of 20 mg of hydrocortisone to placebo both 5 and 35 minutes after injection using different methods of functional connectivity analysis (seed based network analysis, cross correlation analysis, functional connectivity density mapping [FCDM]). Among 15 preselected seed based networks, time-by-drug effects were mainly detected in subgenual/subcallosal areas, with hypothesis-free FCDM similarly demonstrating the anterior cingulate to response most strongly. Hippocampal responses as previously highlighted were rather weak [2,3], pointing out that possibly prefrontal/anterior cingulate areas sense circulating cortisol sensitively to reorganize connectivity patterns. Results share similarity with PET results from trauma patients [4] and acute stress experiments [5]. In-depth seed analyses on the basis of the FCDM result in the ACC will be performed to further decode the connectivity changes induced by cortisol. [1] Henckens et al. J Neurosci 2010;30:12725 – 32 [2] Lovallo et al. PNEC 2010;35:15 – 20 [3] Symmonds et al. ENP 2012;22:867 – 74 [4] Liberzon et al. AJP 2007;164:1250 – 8 [5] Thomason et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2011;52:102
ISSN:0176-3679
1439-0795
DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1353287