Comparative Study between Surgical Excision of Radial Head Fracture versus Arthroplasty, a Systematic Review of Literature

• Published in: QJM : An International Journal of Medicine Vol. 114; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Megied, Wael S. Abdel, Khaled, Ahmed M, Rehan, Waleed M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 01.10.2021
• Subjects: arthroplasty no associated ligaments injuries. So no clinical differences between both techniques; radial head fracture; surgical excision
• ISSN: 1460-2725; 1460-2393
• DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcab104.022

Abstract Background Radial head fracture is the most frequently diagnosed fracture of the elbow in adults. The radial head is a secondary valgus stabilizer of the joint and it is involved in transmission of axial force load through the elbow during flexion. It is also a varus and external rotatory constraint. Aim of the Work to compare the functional outcome between excision of head radius and Arthroplasty in surgical management of radial head fractures (Mason types III and IV) and to assess the complications of both techniques. Patients and methods This systemic review included subjects suffered comminuted radial head fracture Mason type III or type IV treated by radial head excision or arthroplastyin the last 14 years from 2004 till 2018. Results: The database search identified 152 potentially relevant articles. Abstracts have been analyzed following inclusion and exclusion criteria and a total of 17 papers were selected for the present review. Most of retrospective studies on metal radial head prosthesis have been published in the last ten years in comparison to a lack of studies for radial head excision in the last two decades. Moreover, few articles on comparison of the two surgical techniques have been found. Because of heterogeneity in level of evidence, surgical technique, type of implants, and rehabilitation protocol, we did not perform statistical data analysis. Conclusion No clinical differences between radial head excision and arthroplasty as both methods are considerable regarding complication on long & mid-term follow up and functional outcome assessed by DASH, VAS, MEPS & ROM.