Exploratory analysis of outcomes for patients with locally advanced or metastatic radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-RDTC) receiving open-label Sorafenib post-progression on the phase III decision trial

Background: RAI-rDTC patients treated with sorafenib (SOR) in the phase III placebo (PLC)-controlled DECISION trial had significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who progressed in the double-blind (DB) period were unblinded and at the investigator's discretion allowed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExperimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
Main Authors Paschke, R, Schlumberger, M, Nutting, C, Jarzab, B, Elisei, R, Siena, S, Bastholt, L, de la Fouchardiere, C, Pacini, F, Shong, YK, Sherman, SI, Smit, J, Kappeler, C, Molnar, I, Brose, MF
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published 12.03.2015
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: RAI-rDTC patients treated with sorafenib (SOR) in the phase III placebo (PLC)-controlled DECISION trial had significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who progressed in the double-blind (DB) period were unblinded and at the investigator's discretion allowed to receive open-label (OL) SOR and then followed for subsequent disease progression (PFS2). Methods: PFS2, an exploratory endpoint, was defined as time from new baseline until centrally assessed progression or death during or after OL-SOR treatment. Results: A total of 207 patients were randomized to sorafenib (DB-SOR) and 210 to placebo (DB-PLC). 150 PLC patients crossed over to OL-SOR at progression; 137 evaluable for efficacy (PLC-SOR). 55 DB-SOR patients continued OL-SOR at progression; 46 evaluable for efficacy (SOR-SOR). The PLC-SOR and SOR-SOR patients had poorer risk features at enrollment compared to patients not assessed for PFS2. Partial responses in the DB-SOR and PLC-SOR patients were 12.2% and 9.5%, respectively. Among SOR-SOR patients with progression events in both periods, PFS2 was more than two-fold longer than PFS1 in 22%. The median treatment duration for SOR patients receiving DB and OL treatment was 56.9 weeks. Adverse events were similar for PLC-SOR and DB-SOR patients. For SOR-SOR patients, diarrhea and hand-foot skin reactions were reduced compared to the DB-SOR treatment period. Conclusions: PFS2 for the subset of PLC patients who crossed over to OL-SOR was longer (9.6 months) than PFS1 (5.3 months). Continuation of SOR after progression needs to be explored further.
ISSN:0947-7349
1439-3646
DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1547632