Long‐term experience of one‐day stereotactic irradiation in patients with uveal melanoma

Purpose Uveal melanoma (iris, ciliary body, choroid) is the most frequent intraocular malignant tumor in adults. One day session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with 35.0 Gy is one of current treatment options. Radiation complications can lead to visual acuity reduction or secondary enucleation of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) Vol. 100; no. S267
Main Authors Furdova, Alena, Sramka, Miron, Smolkova, Bozena, Furda, Robert, Jurenova, Denisa, Plesnikova, Paulina, Lyskova, Darina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Uveal melanoma (iris, ciliary body, choroid) is the most frequent intraocular malignant tumor in adults. One day session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with 35.0 Gy is one of current treatment options. Radiation complications can lead to visual acuity reduction or secondary enucleation of the eye globe. Radiation‐induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a severe ocular complication developing in high‐risk patients with uveal melanoma after SRS. Methods Long‐term analysis of 210 patients with intraocular uveal melanoma treated by SRS at linear accelerator LINAC in Slovakia by ‘One‐day session’ method: we analyzed association between the secondary enucleation and the presence of secondary glaucoma as well as the radiation‐induced optic neuropathy after SRS. Results The median tumor volume at baseline was 0.3cm3 with range from 0.1 to 2.7 cm3. The therapeutic dose was 35.0Gy by 99% of DVH (dose volume histogram). Average overall survival after stereotactic irradiation was 1st year after SRS 95%, 2nd year 81%, in 5 years 80%. Secondary enucleation was necessary 17% patients due to secondary glaucoma. The presence of RION was significantly associated with a higher dose on the optic nerve (p = 0.0122 in invariable and 0.0039 in multivariable analysis, respectively). Importantly, the overall survival of patients who underwent secondary enucleation was not different from the survival of patients without enucleation (p = 0.691). Conclusions Survival rates at 5‐year interval and percentage of secondary enucleation due to complications after one‐day session linear accelerator irradiation are comparable to those achieved with other irradiation techniques (brachytherapy, proton beam irradiation).
ISSN:1755-375X
1755-3768
DOI:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2022.171