Impacts on the marine environment in the case of a hypothetical accident involving the recovery of the dumped Russian submarine K-27, based on dispersion of 137 Cs

• Published in: Journal of environmental radioactivity Vol. 167; pp. 170 - 179
• Main Authors: Hosseini, A, Amundsen, I, Brown, J, Dowdall, M, Karcher, M, Kauker, F, Schnur, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.02.2017
• Subjects: Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis; Radiation Monitoring; Radioactive Hazard Release; Radioactive Waste; Ships - statistics & numerical data; Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis; Water Pollution, Radioactive - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 0265-931X; 1879-1700
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.11.032

There is increasing concern regarding the issue of dumped nuclear waste in the Arctic Seas and in particular dumped objects with Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF). Amongst dumped objects in the Arctic, the dumped Russian submarine K-27 has received great attention as it contains two reactors with highly enriched fuel and lies at a depth of about 30 m under water. To address these concerns a health and environmental impact assessment has been undertaken. Marine dispersion of potentially released radionuclides as a consequence of different hypothetical accident scenarios was modelled using the model NAOSIM. The outputs from the dispersion modelling have been used as inputs to food-chain transfer and environmental dosimetry models. The annual effective doses for subsistence fishing communities of the Barents-Kara seas region do not exceed 0.6 mSv for hypothetical accidents located at Stepovogo fjord or the Barents Sea. For high rate consumers of fish in Norway, following a potential accident at the Gremikha Bay, annual effects doses would be at around 0.15 mSv. Accumulated doses (over 90 days) for various organisms and for all release scenarios considered were never in excess of 150 μGy. The levels of Cs derived for marine organism in areas close to Norway were not values that would likely cause concern from a regulatory perspective although for subsistence fishing communities close to the considered accident locations, it is not inconceivable that some restrictions on fishing etc. would need to be introduced.