Cyclosporine A therapy in patients with COVID-19 and failure of immunosuppression therapy: a retrospective cohort propensity-score matched analysis

INTRODUCTION: Therapy of COVID-19 patients with progressive lung damage after the use of glucocorticosteroids (GCS) and interleukin-6 inhibitors (IIL-6) has not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the effectiveness of cyclosporine A in patients with COVID-19 with progression of lung damage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVestnik intensivnoĭ terapii no. 4; pp. 125 - 138
Main Authors Merzhoeva, Z. M., Yaroshetskiy, A. I., Savko, S. A., Krasnoshchekova, A. P., Mandel, Irina A., Tsareva, N. A., Trushenko, N. V., Nuralieva, G. S., Avdeev, S. N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 30.10.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:INTRODUCTION: Therapy of COVID-19 patients with progressive lung damage after the use of glucocorticosteroids (GCS) and interleukin-6 inhibitors (IIL-6) has not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the effectiveness of cyclosporine A in patients with COVID-19 with progression of lung damage and hypoxemic acute respiratory failure, who received therapy with GCS and IIL-6. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort propensity-score matched analysis (n = 98). Cyclosporine A was prescribed in the first 72–96 hours after IIL-6 administration when the patient's condition worsened. The patients of comparison group corresponded to the study group, but did not receive cyclosporine A therapy. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints — duration of hospitalization, number of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), need for respiratory support. RESULTS: Mortality was 12 (22) % in the cyclosporine group and 27 (61) % in the comparison group, р = 0.001 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.00 (1.12–3.48), р = 0.018), ICU admission rate 14 (26) % vs 29 (66) %, р = 0.001, respectively. In the cyclosporine group on day 7 CT-4, there were 26 % of patients vs 52 % in the control group, р = 0.014, the need for respiratory support (37 % vs 63.6 %, р = 0.011); saturation 88 % (82–93) vs 80 % (70–86), р = 0.001, respectively. The need for respiratory support at day 11 after IIL-6 increased the likelihood of death (HR 7.10 (2.5–20), р = 0.001). Risk factors for death: age over 57.5 years, body mass index over 30 kg/m2, hemoglobin oxygen saturation below 85.5 % on the day of IIL-6 application. Duration of hospitalization was 18.5 (14–24) days vs 18 (12–24) days, р = 0.778. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine A in addition to GCS and IIL-6 for COVID-19 therapy may reduce mortality, ICU admissions, and respiratory support requirements.
ISSN:1726-9806
1818-474X
DOI:10.21320/1818-474X-2023-4-125-138