Classification techniques using gray level co-occurrence matrix features for the detection of lung cancer using computed tomography imaging

Lung cancer, which causes the majority of fatalities worldwide each year, is one of the deadliest diseases. The survival rate of cancer patients could be improved with better cancer detection methods. Image processing and machine learning have both been used to aid in lung cancer detection, but a me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca) Vol. 13; no. 5; p. 5135
Main Authors Chikkalingaiah, Shankara, Rao Hari Prasad, Subbarao Anantha Padmanabha, Uggregowda, Latha Dabbegatta
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.10.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lung cancer, which causes the majority of fatalities worldwide each year, is one of the deadliest diseases. The survival rate of cancer patients could be improved with better cancer detection methods. Image processing and machine learning have both been used to aid in lung cancer detection, but a method that both increase accuracy and increases a patient’s survival rate has yet to be identified. In an effort to find the most effective method for the accurate lung cancer recognition, this paper analyses and compares several classification algorithms. Lung computed tomography (CT) images are enhanced by removing noise using a median filter. For filtered image, threshold segmentation is used to segment it into distinct parts. From the segmented image different features are extracted using the grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). several classification strategies, including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and decision tree (DT) methods, are used to classify lung images as malignant or normal based on the extracted features. Methods are evaluated based on a number of various performance measures, like accuracy, a precision, the recall, and the F1-Score. Based on the experimental outcomes, SVM outperforms other classification methods in accurately detecting lung cancer with an accuracy of 99.32%.
ISSN:2088-8708
2722-2578
DOI:10.11591/ijece.v13i5.pp5135-5146