437. MEASUREMENT OF FUNCTIONAL, PSYCHOSOCIAL, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IMPACTS OF ROBOTIC VERSUS HYBRID OESOPHAGO-GASTRECTOMY

• Published in: Diseases of the esophagus Vol. 37; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Paine, Heidi, Rayner, Charles, Tehranchi, Sam, Luangsomboon, Aphiwat, McGuire, Ms Anna, Walker, Robert, Madhavan, Anantha, Singh, Pritam, Preston, Shaun R, Abbassi-Ghadi, Nima
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.09.2024
• ISSN: 1120-8694; 1442-2050
• DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae057.187

Abstract Background Since the introduction of Robotic-Assisted Minimally-Invasive Oesophago-gastrectomy (RAMIO), comparisons to other surgical approaches have focussed primarily on peri-operative and oncological outcomes. Few studies have focused on quality-of-life measures once the patient has been discharged home. We sought to compare physical, psychosocial, sleep, pain and employment related measures at six weeks following discharge in patients undergoing RAMIO versus Hybrid Oesophago-gastrectomy. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study comparing RAMIO and Hybrid Oesophago-gastrectomy. Twenty-five consecutive patients on a curative surgical pathway were recruited to each group. Participants were contacted via telephone pre-operatively and six weeks post-operatively. Parameters studied were: physical activity, social activity, sleep, pain control, and employment. Psychological wellbeing was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and quality of life with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires C30 (all cancer patients) and OG25 (patients undergoing oesophago-gastric cancer treatment). Results were analysed using Chi Square and Mann-Whitney-U statistical tests. Results There were no differences in age, ASA, or anaerobic threshold between study groups. At six weeks the RAMIO group was more likely than Hybrid to have returned to pre-operative physical and social activity (physical 7/25 vs. 1/25, p=0.04, social 13/25 vs. 5/25, p=0.03). The RAMIO group stopped regular analgesia earlier, and required fewer opiates. Patients were more likely to return to work in the RAMIO group (7/15 vs. 1/12,p=0.04). The RAMIO group had fewer cases of depression (2 vs. 9, p=0.03), lower QLQ C30 and OG25 scores, and reported higher overall health and quality of life scores (p=0.001). Conclusion We have demonstrated an improvement in physical and social activity, a faster return to work, a reduction in analgesia requirements, lower rates of depression and improved health and quality of life, six weeks post-operatively when comparing RAMIO to Hybrid Oesophago-Gastrectomy. This study has highlighted additional considerations for the selection of surgical modality in oesophago-gastrectomy beyond peri-operative outcomes. Further investigation across a larger sample size and longer time frame to quantify the full spectrum of potential benefits of robotic oesophago-gastric surgery is warranted.