A-32 Association Between Adolescent Patient Emotional Factors and Adherence to a Sport-Related Concussion Treatment

Abstract Purpose: To determine the association between Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and adherence to an exercise treatment for sport-related concussion (SRC). We hypothesized Positive Affect (PA) score would be positively associated, while ASI and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of clinical neuropsychology Vol. 37; no. 5; p. 1073
Main Authors Mian, R K, Brayton, R P, Price, A M, Knell, G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 19.07.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Purpose: To determine the association between Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and adherence to an exercise treatment for sport-related concussion (SRC). We hypothesized Positive Affect (PA) score would be positively associated, while ASI and Negative Affect (NA) score would be negatively associated with odds of treatment adherence. Methods: This was a prospective (2020–2021) analysis of adolescents (aged 14–17) diagnosed with SRC by a pediatric specialty concussion clinic and subsequently prescribed daily exercise. Adherence to the exercise protocol was defined as consistently increasing physical activity volume (measured by accelerometer) during recovery. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated the independent associations between treatment adherence and ASI; PA score; NA score. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) recovery time was 16.1 (9.0) days. Among the 32 (56.1%) adherent and 25 (43.9%) not adherent participants, the majority were aged 15 years (29.8%), male (50.9%), non-Hispanic White (70.2%), and had no concussion history (61.4%). After adjusting for age and sex, the odds of treatment adherence for each additional unit increase in ASI, PA score, and NA score was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.96–1.10), 1.14 (95% CI: 0.97–1.35), and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.95–1.47), respectively. Conclusions: Despite lack of statistical significance, it appears that PA score and NA score may contribute to exercise treatment adherence for SRC. As this study may be underpowered, future studies should aim to have a larger sample and investigate the discriminate utility of PANAS to identify those who may or may not adhere to SRC exercise treatments.
ISSN:1873-5843
1873-5843
DOI:10.1093/arclin/acac32.32