Neural interactions in developing rhythmogenic spinal networks: Insights from computational modeling

Abstract The mechanisms involved in generation of rhythmic locomotor activity in the mammalian spinal cord remain poorly understood. These mechanisms supposedly rely on both intrinsic properties of constituting neurons and interactions between them. A subset of Shox2 neurons was found to contribute...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inbioRxiv
Main Authors Shevtsova, Natalia A, Ha, Ngoc T, Rybak, Ilya A, Dougherty, Kimberly J
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 07.10.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract The mechanisms involved in generation of rhythmic locomotor activity in the mammalian spinal cord remain poorly understood. These mechanisms supposedly rely on both intrinsic properties of constituting neurons and interactions between them. A subset of Shox2 neurons was found to contribute to generation of spinal locomotor activity, but the possible cellular basis for rhythmic bursting in these neurons remains unknown. Ha and Dougherty (2018) recently revealed the presence of bidirectional electrical coupling between Shox2 neurons in neonatal spinal cords, which can be critically involved in neuronal synchronization and generation of populational bursting. Gap junctional connections found between functionally-related Shox2 interneurons decrease with age, possibly being replaced by increasing interactions through chemical synapses. Here, we developed a computational model of a heterogeneous population of neurons sparsely connected by electrical or/and chemical synapses and investigated the dependence of frequency of populational bursting on the type and strength of neuronal interconnections. The model proposes a mechanistic explanation for emergence of a synchronized rhythmic activity in the neuronal population and provides insights into the mechanisms of the locomotor rhythm generation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * The manuscript text has been revised.
DOI:10.1101/2020.09.15.298281