PP14 Development Of The European Network For Health Technology Assessment Standards Tool For Registries In Health Technology Assessment

• Published in: International journal of technology assessment in health care Vol. 34; no. S1; p. 70
• Main Authors: Garcia, Emmanuel Gimenez, Espallargues, Mireia, Long, Jae, Valentic, Maja, Guzina, Irena, Rodrigues, Jorge, Varela-Lema, Leonor, Dedeu, Toni
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 2018
• Subjects: Evaluation; Health; Health technology assessment; Poster Presentations; Quality standards; Technology assessment; Europe
• ISSN: 0266-4623; 1471-6348
• DOI: 10.1017/S0266462318001861

Introduction:Bridging gaps between registry-holders, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) producers and users is one of the aims of the European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3. In this context, a post-launch evidence generation tool is being developed, including a quality standards tool for registries in HTA. The standards tool for registries in HTA will enable, among others, registry owners to consistently collect high quality registry data, and HTA agencies to use proper registry data collected by others as evidence for their assessments. The objective is to present the first draft version of the tool structure, which is going to be piloted during the forthcoming months.Methods:A review and description of the currently available first version (November 2017) sections, items and criteria for HTA studies.Results:The tool is divided in three sections; “Methodological Information”, “Essential Standards” and “Additional Requirements”. The first section enables users to analyze not only the ability of the registry to answer to research questions but also to check the registry transparency. The second section encloses the essential elements of good practice and evidence quality (therefore all of them must be met before an HTA report can use the registry data). Finally, the third section includes elements of good practice and evidence quality useful to consider in planning and evaluating registries for specific purposes. Although suggestions are defined, the third section item requirements could depend on the individual HTA agency perspectives and needs.Conclusions:There is a clear growing availability and requirement for real world data for health technology assessment. A piloted and robust registry standards tool for HTA can provide a relevant basis to improve both the evidence generation but also to make more trustful and excellent evaluations.