THE PERCEIVED VALUE OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT INFLUENCE STRATEGIES

In this study, we assessed the generalizability of the Western preference for direct versus indirect influence strategies and its relation to participant sex, perceptions of participant power, and concerns for politeness among a sample of 138 American, 41 Japanese, and 44 Korean female and male coll...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychology of women quarterly Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 457 - 462
Main Authors Steil, Janice M., Hillman, Jennifer L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.1993
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this study, we assessed the generalizability of the Western preference for direct versus indirect influence strategies and its relation to participant sex, perceptions of participant power, and concerns for politeness among a sample of 138 American, 41 Japanese, and 44 Korean female and male college students. Regardless of cultural group or participant sex, direct strategies were reported as first choice strategies, whereas indirect strategies were cited as strategies of last resort. Participant power, not participant sex, was predictive of the students’reported strategy use. Although the American, Japanese, and Korean students were more similar than different on measures of perceived power and frequency of strategy use, concerns for politeness were reflected in the Japanese and Korean students’less confrontational strategy style.
Bibliography:We gratefully acknowledge the directors and teaching staff of Adelphi University's LIFE program and Mike Barns, Jeff Cox, and George Grainy for their assistance in data collection. We also thank Patrick Ross for his advice regarding statistical procedures.
ISSN:0361-6843
1471-6402
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00655.x