Large Language Models for CAD-RADS 2.0 Extraction From Semi-Structured Coronary CT Angiography Reports: A Multi-Institutional Study

• Published in: Korean journal of radiology Vol. 26; no. 9; pp. 817 - 831
• Main Authors: Min, Dabin, Jin, Kwang Nam, Bang, SangHeum, Kim, Moon Young, Kim, Hack-Lyoung, Jeong, Won Gi, Lee, Hye-Jeong, Beck, Kyongmin Sarah, Hwang, Sung Ho, Kim, Eun Young, Park, Chang Min
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 대한영상의학회 01.09.2025
• Subjects: 방사선과학
• ISSN: 1229-6929; 2005-8330
• DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2025.0293

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) in extracting Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) 2.0 components from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reports, and assess the impact of prompting strategies. Materials and Methods: In this multi-institutional study, we collected 319 synthetic, semi-structured CCTA reports from six institutions to protect patient privacy while maintaining clinical relevance. The dataset included 150 reports from a primary institution (100 for instruction development and 50 for internal testing) and 169 reports from five external institutions for external testing. Board-certified radiologists established reference standards following the CAD-RADS 2.0 guidelines for all three components: stenosis severity, plaque burden, and modifiers. Six LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-4o, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, o1-mini, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B) were evaluated using an optimized instruction with prompting strategies, including zero-shot or few-shot with or without chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. The accuracy was assessed and compared using McNemar’s test. Results: LLMs demonstrated robust accuracy across all CAD-RADS 2.0 components. Peak stenosis severity accuracies reached 0.980 (48/49, Claude-3.5-Sonnet and o1-mini) in internal testing and 0.946 (158/167, GPT-4o and o1-mini) in external testing. Plaque burden extraction showed exceptional accuracy, with multiple models achieving perfect accuracy (43/43) in internal testing and 0.993 (137/138, GPT-4o, and o1-mini) in external testing. Modifier detection demonstrated consistently high accuracy (≥0.990) across most models. One open-source model, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B, showed a relatively low accuracy for stenosis severity: 0.898 (44/49, internal) and 0.820 (137/167, external). CoT prompting significantly enhanced the accuracy of several models, with GPT-4 showing the most substantial improvements: stenosis severity accuracy increased by 0.192 (P < 0.001) and plaque burden accuracy by 0.152 (P < 0.001) in external testing. Conclusion: LLMs demonstrated high accuracy in automated extraction of CAD-RADS 2.0 components from semi-structured CCTA reports, particularly when used with CoT prompting. KCI Citation Count: 0