Assignment of the Nominative Case in Jussive Structures in Arabic Syntax: A Minimalist View
An assumption given by Radford (1988, p. 307) says "Any clause which contains C contains a compatible I/". [...]mood clauses in English require an overt complementizer and any clause that contains [C] also contains an [T], then it follows that mood complement clause contains [T] node. [......
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of language teaching and research Vol. 3; no. 5; p. 915 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Academy Publication Co., Ltd
01.09.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | An assumption given by Radford (1988, p. 307) says "Any clause which contains C contains a compatible I/". [...]mood clauses in English require an overt complementizer and any clause that contains [C] also contains an [T], then it follows that mood complement clause contains [T] node. [...]though [T, T] is filled with empty tense, in (1 and 2), the subject position checks the nominative case feature. Agrs specifies the over as well as the covert subject for correct interpretation of Arabic sentence at LF after being attached to V. Agrs is strong feature and cannot be deleted at all levels of syntax. [...]it helps to understand the significance of jussive mood in Arabic syntax in a proper manner. If the subject is covert, it remains in the position of [Spec, T"]; however, if it is pro, it lands in the same position for case checking; but, it has to be omitted at the interface level. [...]case theory is a mechanism that accounts for the assignment of case to the subject and regulates the grammaticality of the sentence before LF. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-General Information-1 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1798-4769 2053-0684 |
DOI: | 10.4304/jltr.3.5.915-922 |