Targeted therapies (TT) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): An Italian survey of 902 pts

Abstract only e15514 Background: TT have improved the outcome in mRCC; however, definite data regarding their efficacy when used in the community setting are still insufficient. This survey was aimed to evaluate survival in subsequent lines of treatment (tx) in mRCC pts treated outside clinical tria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 31; no. 15_suppl; p. e15514
Main Authors Pasini, Felice, Fraccon, Anna Paola, Barile, Carmen, Sacco, Cosimo, Sava, Teodoro, Valduga, Francesco, Basso, Umberto, Vattemi, Emanuela, Rosti, Giovanni, Durante, Emilia, Nicodemo, Maurizio, Lo Re, Giovanni, Cengarle, Rita, Bertocchi, Paola, Bernardi, Daniele, Sartori, Donata, Donati, Donatella, Pegoraro, Cristina, Inno, Alessandro, Bassan, Franco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.05.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only e15514 Background: TT have improved the outcome in mRCC; however, definite data regarding their efficacy when used in the community setting are still insufficient. This survey was aimed to evaluate survival in subsequent lines of treatment (tx) in mRCC pts treated outside clinical trials. Methods: Individual data from the clinical records of 902 pts treated with TT from mid 2007 to December 2012 were obtained from 28 Italian Institutions, through a questionnaire sent after approval by local ethical committees. Results: Median follow up was 26 mo (range 1-85), median age was 60 yrs (range 25-89), 75% were male. At onset metastatic sites were lung (62%), lymph nodes (38%), bone (31%); each of the other sites <10%. Median overall survival (mOS) was 24 mo (range 1-85) without statistical difference among the various centres. Sunitinib was the 1 st line tx in 693 pts (76.6%), sorafenib in 124 (13.7%) , temsirolimus in 35 (4%), bevacizumab in 26 (3%), pazopanib in 19 (1.5%), others 5. Median PFS of 1 st line (mPFS1) sunitinib was 11 mo and that of sorafenib 7 mo. Type of response: CR 32 (3.5%), PR 274 (30%), SD 275 (30%); PD 265 (29%), not evaluable 33 (3.5%), tx ongoing 23 (2.5%). Dose reduction of sunitinib and sorafenib was required in 49% and 39% of the cycles administered, respectively; 137 pts (15%) received only 1 cycle of sunitinib mostly for rapid progression and/or deterioration. 2 nd line tx was performed in 46% of the pts: sorafenib 143 (16%), everolimus 121 (13%), sunitinib 100 (11%), temsirolimus 25 (3%), chemo-immunotherapy 26 (3%), others 1%. mPFS2 was 6 mo with sunitinib and about 4 mo with the other tx (p=0.001). 155 pts (17%) received 3 lines of tx: mOS of TKI-TKI-mTOR (A), TKI-mTOR-TKI (B) and other (C) triplets were 48, 37 and 33 mo, respectively; A vs B p= 0.06; A vs C p= 0.01. Overall PFS3 was 6 mo. Conclusions: i) This survey shows that data of clinical trials were reproduced in the real world setting; ii) a good proportion of pts achieved long OS after subsequent lines of tx; iii) on the other hand, a similar percentage of pts experienced rapid progression; iv) further studies are needed to better identify the different subsets of pts in order to improve the efficacy of TT.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e15514