Complications of thermal ablation of hepatic tumors: Comparison of radiofrequency and microwave techniques

• Published in: Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 31; no. 15_suppl; p. e15040
• Main Authors: Jing, Xiang, Ding, Jianmin, Liu, Jibin, Wang, Yandong, Wang, Fengmei, Wang, Yijun, Du, Zhi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 20.05.2013
• ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755
• DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e15040

Abstract only e15040 Background: The efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been reported in the literatures, which are considered as frontline choice for treatment of liver cancer. Recently, microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged and gained great attention over RFA. However, in comparison to RFA, the safety of MWA for treatment of liver cancer has not been fully reported in the literatures. Studies with large clinical data sets are still needed to understand the technique and avoid the complications. The objective of this study was to retrospectively investigate the common complications of thermal ablations of liver tumors using both RFA and MWA techniques, and compare the safety between these two procedures. Methods: This retrospective study protocol was approved by our institutional ethics committee to allow investigators to review the existing patient’s medical records. A total of 879 patients with hepatic tumors underwent thermal ablation. There were 323 cases having the RFA procedures and 556 cases having MWA procedures. The complications of thermal ablations of liver tumors were compared using both RFA and MWA techniques. Results: A total of 1,030 thermal ablation sessions was performed in 879 patients with a total of 1,652 tumors. There were 323 patients with 562 tumors received a total of 376 RFA with averaged 1.16±0.48 sessions per patient. The other 556 patients with 1,090 tumors received a total of 654 MWA with averaged1.18±0.51 sessions per patient. The mortality rates were 0.31% (1/323) and 0.36% (2/556) in RFA and MWA group. In RFA and MWA group, the major complication rates were 3.5% (13/376) and 3.1% (20/654) (Table 1), meanwhile the minor complication rates were 5.9% (22/376) and 5.7% (37/654). There was no statistical significant difference for the mortality rates, the major complications, the minor complications between the RFA and MWA groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Thermal ablation therapy in the treatment of liver cancers is relatively safe with low mortality and low incidence of serious complications. The types and incidences of complications caused by RFA and MWA are similar and comparable for safety consideration in clinical settings.