Effects of parental status on male body mass in the monogamous, biparental C alifornia mouse
Abstract Studies of biparental mammals demonstrate that males may undergo systematic changes in body mass as a consequence of changes in reproductive status; however, these studies typically have not teased apart the effects of specific social and reproductive factors, such as cohabitation with a fe...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of zoology (1987) Vol. 296; no. 1; pp. 23 - 29 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.05.2015
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
Studies of biparental mammals demonstrate that males may undergo systematic changes in body mass as a consequence of changes in reproductive status; however, these studies typically have not teased apart the effects of specific social and reproductive factors, such as cohabitation with a female
per se
, cohabitation with a breeding female specifically, and engagement in paternal care. We aimed to determine whether
C
alifornia mouse
P
eromyscus californicus
fathers undergo systematic changes in body mass and if so, which specific social/reproductive factor(s) might contribute to these changes. We compared mean weekly body masses over a 5‐week period in (1) males housed with another male versus males housed with a non‐reproductive (tubally ligated) female; (2) males housed with a tubally ligated female versus males housed with a female that was undergoing her first pregnancy; (3) experienced fathers housed with versus without pups during their mate's subsequent pregnancy. Body mass did not differ between males housed with another male and those housed with a non‐reproductive female; however, males housed with a non‐reproductive female were significantly heavier than those housed with a primigravid female. Among experienced fathers, those housed with pups from their previous litter underwent significant increases in body mass across their mates' pregnancy, whereas fathers housed without pups did not. These results suggest that male body mass is reduced by cohabitation with a breeding (pregnant) female, but not by cohabitation with a non‐reproductive female, and that increases in body mass across the mate's pregnancy are associated with concurrent care of offspring rather than cohabitation with a pregnant female. Additional work is needed to determine the mechanisms and functional significance, if any, of these changes in male body mass with reproductive condition. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0952-8369 1469-7998 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jzo.12211 |