Non-medical use of methylphenidate by medical students: prevalence and motivations. Integrative review

Objective: This study performed a literature review evaluating aspects of prevalence and motivations on the non-medical use of methylphenidate by medical students. Methods: We searched the Scopus, PubMed, SciELO, and Web of Science databases and the Google Scholar search tool using the keywords &quo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista Ciências em Saúde Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 24 - 34
Main Authors Batista da Costa, Leticia, Sousa, Jiliélisson Oliveira de, Silva, Samillys Valeska Bezerra de França, Almeida, Valéria Duarte de, Fernandes, Thales Allyrio Araújo de Medeiros
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hospital de Clínicas de Itajubá 22.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: This study performed a literature review evaluating aspects of prevalence and motivations on the non-medical use of methylphenidate by medical students. Methods: We searched the Scopus, PubMed, SciELO, and Web of Science databases and the Google Scholar search tool using the keywords "Methylphenidate" and "Medical Student" and their correlates in Portuguese. A total of 472 articles were recovered, of which 24 were included for full reading and discussion after the application of the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: It was observed that the prevalence of non-prescribed use of methylphenidate ranged from 0.51% in Lithuania to 35% in Colombia. The main motivations reported for using the drug were academic outcomes improvement and increase in concentration during studies, although research shows no significant improvement in academic performance with the use of medication by healthy individuals. Conclusion: The non-prescribed use of methylphenidate presents a high and worrying frequency. Also, scientific studies questioning the use of psychostimulant medications for cognitive improvement by healthy students make the practice illegal and unfounded.
ISSN:2236-3785
2236-3785
DOI:10.21876/rcshci.v11i2.1042