METHOD COMPARISON IN THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM OF A SCHOLARSHIP SELECTION

Commonly, the current scholarship selection process has different targets and various criteria for its prospective scholarship recipients. This causes the decision-making process for scholarship selection to be complex, whereas in the general scholarship selection is time-limited. The solution that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJurnal Ilmiah Kursor: Menuju Solusi Teknologi Informasi Vol. 11; no. 2; p. 75
Main Authors Bachtiar, Mohammad Iqbal, Suyono, Hadi, Purnomo, M. Fauzan Edy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Informatics Department, Engineering Faculty 11.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Commonly, the current scholarship selection process has different targets and various criteria for its prospective scholarship recipients. This causes the decision-making process for scholarship selection to be complex, whereas in the general scholarship selection is time-limited. The solution that can be done is to use a DSS (Decision Support System) to improve consistency and speed up decision-making. The available methods for making a DSS used in this study are the Analytical Hierarchy Process, TOPSIS, and the second model using a deep learning approach. The performance of the DSS will then be evaluated using a Confusion Matrix to determine the cost level of each DSS and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each DSS. The DSS model with the AHP-TOPSIS approach has been successfully created, with the accuracy performance for introducing data on merit, bidikmisi, and independent scholarship schemes are 56.72%, 65.21%, and 95.87%, respectively. While the DSS model with a deep learning approach has been successfully created with accuracy performance of 71.93%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. There are considerable differences between these two approaches. This may be due to the weighting process in the AHP approach which cannot be carried out with precision.
ISSN:0216-0544
2301-6914
DOI:10.21107/kursor.v11i2.263