Antibody seroprevalence against SARS-Cov-2 among chronic myeloid leukemia patients

e19061Background: The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 has elicited an equally rapid development of effective vaccines, leading to a reduction of COVID-19 severity and deaths. There is limited data on COVID-19-related immunity in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Methods: SPARTA (SARS2 SeroPrevalen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 40; no. 16_suppl; p. e19061
Main Authors Miranda, Marisol, Bradshaw, Danielle, Farmaha, Jaspreet, Patel, Reeya, Jones, Kimya, Singh, Harmanpreet, Vashisht, Ashutosh, Sahajpal, Nikhil Shri, Kohle, Ravindra, Cortes, Jorge E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Society of Clinical Oncology 01.06.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:e19061Background: The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 has elicited an equally rapid development of effective vaccines, leading to a reduction of COVID-19 severity and deaths. There is limited data on COVID-19-related immunity in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Methods: SPARTA (SARS2 SeroPrevalence And Respiratory Tract Assessment) is an ongoing observational study for participants age ≥18 years to investigate immunity to SARS-CoV-2 after infection and/or vaccination. We included patients with CML and compared them with a non-cancer group. We collected saliva and peripheral blood to measure antigen levels by RT-PCR and antibodies (secretory IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies). Results: From October 1, 2021, to February 4, 2022, we prospectively enrolled 49 participants (23 CML, 26 non-cancer). Most were male (56.5%) in the CML group and female in the control group (61.5%), mean age 56.39 y vs. 51.96 y, respectively, and self-identified as white (87% vs. 76.9%). In the CML group, 11 (47.8%) had ≥1 comorbidities, vs 13 (50%) in the control group. Twenty-one (91.3%) CML patients were receiving tyrosine-kinase inhibitors; 4 (18.2%) non-cancer subjects reported taking any medication. Most participants in both groups had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine (73.9% vs. 73.1%); 100% of CML patients received two doses vs. 84.2% of controls; the CML group had a higher percentage of subjects fully vaccinated (66.7% vs. 25%). The CML group had a lower percentage of patients previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (8.8% vs. 57.7%). However, there was no difference in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen at the time of enrollment (0% vs. 4%). SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were detected in most of the participants regardless of cancer status (78.3% in the CML cohort and 88% in the non-cancer cohort), and neutralizing antibodies were detected in 82.6% and 95.6%, respectively. The two groups had comparable IgG (mean 146.3 Ru/ml vs. 148.9 Ru/ml) and neutralizing (mean 1329.1 ng/ml vs. 1112 ng/ml) antibody levels. Conclusions: Our preliminary data comparing concomitant cohorts with similar socio-demographic characteristics and medical history indicate that a diagnosis of CML did not impact the development of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. We are conducting continuous analysis of antibodies levels over time to assess the evolution of antibody immunity and functional studies including cellular immunity assessments.CharacteristicCML groupno. (%)Non-cancer group no. (%)Previous COVID-19 diagnosedVaccinatedFully vaccinated2/23 (8.8)1/2 (50)1/1 (100)15/26 (57.7)9/15 (60)0/9 (0)IgG Antibodies detected VaccinatedNot vaccinated18/23 (78.3)17/18 (94.4)1/18 (5.6)22/25 (88)16/22 (72.7)6/22 (27.3)Mean IgG Antibodies levels ±SD (Ru/ml)VaccinatedNot vaccinated146.3 ± 56.3143.2 ± 56.5198.0148.9 ± 54.9149.5 ± 62.3147.3 ± 31.2
Bibliography:Abstract Disclosures
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e19061