Adherence to geriatric assessment (GA)-based recommendations in older patients (pts) with cancer

• Published in: Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 35; no. 15_suppl; p. 10010
• Main Authors: Decoster, Lore, Kenis, Cindy, Flamaing, Johan, DeBruyne, Philip, DeGroof, Inge, Focan, C. N. J., Cornelis, Frank, Verschaeve, Vincent, Vanoverbeke, Karen, Libert, Yves, Luce, Sylvie, Nols, Nathalie, Van Den Bulck, Heidi, Goeminne, Jean Charles, Baitar, Abdelbari, Geboers, Katrien, Lobelle, Jean Pierre, Milisen, Koen, Wildiers, Hans
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 20.05.2017
• ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755
• DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.10010

Abstract only 10010 Background: In the general older population, GA-guided treatment plans improve overall survival, quality of life and functional status. In geriatric oncology, studies mainly focused on screening and assessment but not on geriatric interventions and follow-up. The aim of this study was to investigate the adherence to recommendations and subsequent interventions based on GA results in older pts with cancer. Methods: A prospective Belgian multicenter (n = 22) cohort study included pts ≥70 years with a malignant tumor when an oncological treatment decision had to be made. Pts with an abnormal G8 (≤14/17) underwent GA and were included in this study. Recommendations for interventions were formulated based on GA results. At follow-up adherence to GA-based recommendations was documented. Results: From 11-2012 till 2-2015, G8 screening was performed in 8451 pts. 5838 pts with an abnormal G8 were included in the study. Geriatric recommendations were given in 79.2% of pts with a median of 2/pt (range 0-10), most frequently consultation of a dietician (73%) for malnutrition, a social worker (54.8%) for social and functional status problems and a geriatrician (42.1%) for general geriatric problems. Follow-up data were available for 4167 pts. In the group of pts where recommendations were given, at least one intervention was performed in 69% with a median of 1/pt (range 0-6), most frequently dietician (43.4%), social worker (26.1%) and geriatrician (22.6%). A total of 7569 actions were undertaken for a total of 5725 geriatric recommendations. Recommendations were most frequently adhered to for malnutrition, social status and functional status problems. The most frequent actions undertaken were nutritional support and supplements, extended home care and psychological support. Conclusions: This large scale Belgian study focusses on the adherence to GA based interventions in older pts with cancer and contributes to the optimization of care for these pts. We identified the domains for which geriatric interventions are most frequently recommended and adhered to and which health care professionals and referrals are essential in the multidisciplinary approach of older pts with cancer.