A comparative study of student mobility programs in SEAMEO-RIHED, UMAP, and Campus Asia Regulation, challenges, and impacts on higher education regionalization

• Published in: Higher Education Evaluation and Development Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 12 - 24
• Main Authors: Chi Hou, Angela Yung, Hill, Christopher, Chen, Karen Hui-Jung, Tsai, Sandy, Chen, Vivian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Emerald Publishing 07.08.2017
• Subjects: AIMS; CAMPUS Asia; Higher education regionalization; Student mobility programme; UMAP
• ISSN: 2514-5789
• DOI: 10.1108/HEED-08-2017-003

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the student mobility programs of the three initiatives – in Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization-Regional Institution of Higher Education and Development, University Mobility in Asia and Pacific (UMAP), and Campus Asia – and provide a comparative analysis of the respective programs in terms of the role of government, institutional involvement, quality assurance, and challenges. In addition, the paper will assess their impacts on higher education regionalization by regulatory models toward the end of the paper. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts qualitative document analysis as a major research method to explore the developmental models of three student mobility programs. Document analysis is an approach used to gather and review the content of existing written documentation related to the study in order to extract pieces of information in a rigorous and systematic manner. Findings ASEAN International Mobility for Students (AIMS), Collective Action for Mobility Program of University Student in Asia (CAMPUS Asia), and UMAP student mobility schemes have a shared purpose in higher education regionalization, but with different regulatory frameworks and Functional, Organizational, and Political approach models. AIMS and CAMPUS Asia as a strong network and government-led initiatives adopt a combination of functional, organizational, and political approaches; UMAP provides university-driven regional mobility programs with a hybridized force. However, all three of them face the same challenges at regional and national levels, such as different national regulation, coordination among participants, and implementation of credit transfer schemes. Practical implications The scale of three student mobility programs is still low, which results in limited impact on higher education regionalization in Asia. However, a stronger decision-making model and increased financial support to universities and students are desirable for the creation of a sustainable and effective network. Originality/value This is an original research and makes a great contribution to Asian nations.