A New Era of Policing? An Examination of Texas Police Chiefs' Perceptions of Homeland Security

Many claims have been made about how the events of September 11 have thrust American policing into a new era, one wherein homeland security is the dominant strategy. To examine the validity of such claims, a sample of 208 Texas police chiefs is surveyed concerning their perceptions of homeland secur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCriminal justice policy review Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 290 - 309
Main Authors Stewart, Daniel M., Morris, Robert G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.09.2009
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Law
Law enforcement
National security
Police
REAL ID Act 2005-US
September 11 terrorist attacks-2001
Threats
policing strategies
perceptions
preparedness
terrorism
collaboration
homeland security
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Many claims have been made about how the events of September 11 have thrust American policing into a new era, one wherein homeland security is the dominant strategy. To examine the validity of such claims, a sample of 208 Texas police chiefs is surveyed concerning their perceptions of homeland security as a strategy for local law enforcement. Factors that influence those perceptions are also examined. The findings reveal that, whereas the majority of chiefs felt that homeland security had become the dominant strategy of the police institution, few believed that homeland security had become the overriding strategy of their respective departments. Furthermore, regression analyses suggest that federal collaboration, preparedness, and threat perceptions were predictive of homeland security perceptions. Regarding department size, chiefs of very small departments are more likely to report homeland security as their dominant strategy in relation to chiefs of larger departments. Policy implications are discussed.
ISSN:0887-4034
1552-3586
DOI:10.1177/0887403409337225