LCIS and tamoxifen use: A single institution review

Abstract only 1527 Background: Results of the NSABP-P1 trial were published in 1998 showing a 50% reduction in breast cancer in the high- risk population with the use of tamoxifen. The use of tamoxifen is individualized, and depends on both patient and physician factors. We looked at the recommendat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 25; no. 18_suppl; p. 1527
Main Authors Kirstein, L. J., Martei, Y., Roche, C., Smith, B. L., Specht, M. C., Gadd, M. A., Drohan, B., Lawrence, C., Michaelson, J., Hughes, K. S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.06.2007
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only 1527 Background: Results of the NSABP-P1 trial were published in 1998 showing a 50% reduction in breast cancer in the high- risk population with the use of tamoxifen. The use of tamoxifen is individualized, and depends on both patient and physician factors. We looked at the recommendations for and the use of tamoxifen in women with LCIS. Methods: A retrospective chart review at a single institution was performed from March 27, 1980 through September 19, 2005 for patients diagnosed with LCIS. Pathology and operative reports, as well as patient notes were reviewed for discussions about tamoxifen. Data was collected on whether a discussion took place, whether tamoxifen was or was not advised, whether the patient declined to take tamoxifen, whether they took it in the past or were currently on tamoxifen. We also examined the rate of DCIS and invasive cancer in this population. Results: There were 321 patients diagnosed with LCIS. Of those patients 193 were diagnosed after the publication of the P1 trial. Of these 193 patients we identified 104(54%) patients whose charts contained notes indicating a discussion about tamoxifen. The results of the discussion about tamoxifen are as follows: 21(20%) patients were currently taking tamoxifen, 16(15%) had taken it in the past, 37(36%) patients declined to take tamoxifen, and 17(16%) had not made a decision about taking tamoxifen. There were 13(13%) patients for whom tamoxifen was advised against. In the entire cohort of 321 patients, 15% went on to develop DCIS or invasive cancer in the first 12 years of follow up. We did not look at cancer rate Vs tamoxifen use due to the small numbers with available information. Conclusions: While the P1 trial recommends tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention in high-risk patients, in our experience, almost half of the patients did not have a documented discussion about the medication, and the majority of those who did decided not to take tamoxifen. This will likely have a large impact on the rate of DCIS and invasive breast cancer in this group. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.1527