Age-related effects on the pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship between STEALTH liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) and monocytes in patients with refractory solid tumors
Abstract only 2576 Background: STEALTH liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602), a camptothecin analogue, is eliminated by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), which consists of cells including monocytes. CKD-602 released from S-CKD602 is eliminated by the kidney. Therefore, we evaluated the PD relationship be...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 25; no. 18_suppl; p. 2576 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
20.06.2007
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract only
2576
Background: STEALTH liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602), a camptothecin analogue, is eliminated by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), which consists of cells including monocytes. CKD-602 released from S-CKD602 is eliminated by the kidney. Therefore, we evaluated the PD relationship between monocyte and absolute neutrophil counts (ANC; as a control) in blood and S-CKD602 and non-liposomal CKD-602 (NL-CKD602) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors. We also evaluated the effect of age on these relationships. Methods: In a phase I study, S-CKD602 was administered IV x 1 q 3 wk at 0.1 to 2.5 mg/m
2
. In phase I and II studies, NL-CKD602 was administered IV qdx5d q 3 wk at 0.5 to 0.9 mg/m
2
/d and 0.5 mg/m
2
/d, respectively. The % decreases in ANC and monocytes at nadir were calculated. For S-CKD602, pharmacokinetic studies of encapsulated (E), released (R), and sum total (ST=E+R) CKD-602 in plasma and ST in urine were performed and measured by LC-MS/MS. Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) was calculated. Results: For S-CKD602 in all pts (n = 27), the % decrease in ANC and monocytes were 42 ± 30 % and 58 ± 34 %, respectively (P = 0.003). For S-CKD602 in pts < 60 years old (yo) (n = 12), the % decrease in ANC and monocytes were 43 ± 31% and 58 ± 26 %, respectively (P = 0.001). For S-CKD602 in pts = 60 yo (n = 15), the % decrease in ANC and monocytes were 41 ± 31% and 45 ± 36 %, respectively (P = 0.50). For NL-CKD602 (n = 42), % decrease in ANC and monocytes were similar (P > 0.05). For S-CKD602, the relationship between % decrease in monocytes and released CKD-602 AUC in plasma in pts < 60 yo (R
2
= 0.54) and = 60 yo (R
2
= 0.49) was similar. For S-CKD602, the relationship between the % decrease in monocytes and the amount of CKD-602 recovered in the urine was stronger in pts < 60 yo (R
2
= 0.82) compared with = 60 yo (R
2
= 0.30). Conclusions: Monocytes are more sensitive to S-CKD602 compared with neutrophils and the increased sensitivity is related to the liposomal formulation and not CKD-602. These results suggest that monocytes engulf S-CKD602 which causes the release of CKD-602 from the liposome and toxicity to the monocytes, and that the effects are more prominent in pts < 60 yo.
[Table: see text] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
DOI: | 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.2576 |