AB0186 IMPROVEMENT OF RADIOGRAPHIC JOINT DESTRUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN THE LAST DECADE

• Published in: Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 81; no. Suppl 1; p. 1223
• Main Authors: Saito, D., Takakubo, Y., Yoshioka, D., Monma, R., Wanezaki, Y., Aso, M., Naganuma, Y., Oki, H., Honma, R., Yang, S., Sasaki, A., Takagi, M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.06.2022
• ISSN: 0003-4967; 1468-2060
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2799

Background The paradigm shift has caused in the treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before the last decade [1]. The advent of high-dose MTX and biologics has maked it possible to treat RA with early and aggressive therapy, and prevent the joint destruction [2]. Objectives To aim of this study, we investigated the joint destruction and clinical outcomes in patients with early RA every 5 years in the last decade. Methods 81 patients with early RA (within 1 year from their onset of RA) enrolled retrospectively in this study. The number of patients with early RA were 21 in 2009, 23 in 2014, and 37 in 2019, respectively. They had 17 males and 64 females. Mean age was 59 years (19-92) at the first visit to our department. The following items were investigated: age, disease duration from onset to consultation, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) positivity (positivity was defined as >4.5 U/ml), CRP, DAS28CRP4, medications, and modified total sharp score (mTSS) at the time of initial consultation and 1 year later. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistics (PASW 25 software, SPSS Institute Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, p<0.05). Results The ACPA positivity rates were 71.4% (15/21) in 2009, 78.3% (18/21) in 2014, and 78.4% (29/37) in 2019, respectively. The mean value of DAS28CRP4 was 4.7 (2.4-6.8) in 2009, 4.2 (1.2-6.2) in 2014, and 4.2 (2.1-6.7) in 2019 at the time of the first visit to our department respectively. DAS28CRP4 under 2.6 was 29% (6/21) in 2009, 61% (14/23) in 2014, and 54% (20/37) in 2019 1 year after the first visit. The mean improvement of DAS28CRP4 (ΔDAS28CRP4) was -1.2 (-3.9 - 2.1) in 2009, -1.5 (-4.0 - 1.7) in 2014, and -1.7 (-4.1 - 0.4) in 2019, respectively. It had tended to improve gradually, however, it was not significantly different ( p = 0.20, Figure 1). Figure 1. Mean value of improvement of mTSS and DAS28CRP4 (ΔmTSS and ΔDAS28CRP4) from initial visit to 1 year later at 2009, 2014 and 2019. The changing of mTSS for a year (ΔmTSS) was 4.2 (0-17) in 2009, 0.9 (0-10) in 2014, and 0.6 (0-4) in 2019, respectivly. ΔmTSS in 2014 and 2019 was significantly lower compared to that in 2009 ( p <0.05, Figure 1). One year after the first visit to our department, the mean dose of MTX increased to 9.2 mg/week (2-14) in 2014 and 8.7 mg/week (4-16) in 2019 compared to 6.6 mg/week (2-8) in 2009 ( p =0.19). The mean dose of PSL decreased 4.2 mg/day (1-8) in 2014, and 3.8 mg/day (1-10) in 2019 compared to 4.9 mg/day (2-10) in 2009, respectively ( p =0.11). On the other hand, biological DMARDs were introduced in 24% (5/21) in 2009, 13% (3/23) in 2014, and 13% (1/37) in 2019, respectively. Conclusion Jonit destruction has been already reported to begin in patients with early-stage of RA [1, 2]. Based on the results of this study, joint desctruction in early RA was decreased in the last decade, because of more early and aggressive therapy for early RA with increasing mean dose of MTX gradually, not biologic DMARDs in real world. In addition, the mean dose of PSL in 2014 and 2019 decreased compared to that in 2009. The intensive therapy for early RA at our hospital has shown the improvement of joint destruction in the last decade. References [1]Emery P, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, et al. Early referral recommendation for newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: evidence based development of a clinical guide. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:290–297. [2]Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685-699. Disclosure of Interests None declared