AB0366 TOCILIZUMAB FOR TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: MULTICENTER STUDY OF 54 WHITE PATIENTS
Background: Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (1-3). Most evidence in TAK comes from Asian patients. However, white patients seem to have different clinical and prognostic features. Objectives: Our aims were to: a ) assess the...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 80; no. Suppl 1; pp. 1208 - 1209 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.06.2021
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including Takayasu arteritis (TAK)
(1-3).
Most evidence in TAK comes from Asian patients. However, white patients seem to have different clinical and prognostic features.
Objectives:
Our aims were to:
a
) assess the efficacy and safety of TCZ in white patients with refractory TAK,
b
) determine if clinical improvement correlates with imaging outcomes,
c
) compare TCZ in monotherapy (TCZ
MONO
) vs combined with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (TCZ
COMBO
)
Methods:
Multicenter study of white patients with refractory TAK who received TCZ.Outcomes variables were remission, glucocorticoid-sparing effect, improvement in imaging techniques, and adverse events. A comparative study between patients who received TCZ
MONO
and TCZ
COMBO
was performed.
Results:
54 patients (46 women/8 men; median age 42.0 [32.5-50.5] years). TCZ was started after 12.0 [3.0-31.5] months since TAK diagnosis. Remission was achieved in 12/54 (22.2%), 19/49 (38.8%), 23/44 (52.3%) and 27/36 (75%) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Prednisone dose was reduced from 30.0 [12.5-50.0] to 5.0 [0.0-5.6] mg/day at 12 months (Table 1). 10 (26.3%) of the 38 patients in whom an imaging follow-up test was performed showed no radiographic improvement after a median of 9.0 [6.0-14.0] months. 4 of them were in clinical remission.23 (42.6%) patients were on TCZ
MONO
and 31 (57.4%) on TCZ
COMBO
: MTX (n=28), cyclosporine A (n=2), azathioprine (n=1). Patients on TCZ
COMBO
were younger (38.0 [27.0-46.0] vs 45 [38.0-57.0] years; p= 0.048), with a trend to longer TAK duration (21.0 [6.0-38.0] vs 6.0 [1.0-23.0] months; p= 0.08) and higher C-reactive protein (2.4 [0.7-5.6] vs 1.3 [0.3-3.3] mg/dL; p=0.16). Despite these differences, similar outcomes were observed in both groups (log rank p=0.862) (Figure 1). Relevant adverse events were reported in 6 (11.1%) patients, but only 3 developed severe events that required TCZ withdrawal.
Table 1.
Baseline
n=54
Month 1
N=54
Month 3
N=49
Month 6
N=44
Month 12
N=36
Clinical remission
, n (%)
12 (22.2)
19 (38.8)
23 (52.3)
27 (75.0)
Laboratory improvemen
t
CRP (
mg/dL
), median [IQR]
1.5 [0.5-3.5]
0.2 [0.1-0.7]*
0.2 [0.5-0.5]*
0.2 [0.1-0.5]*
0.1 [0.0-0.4]*
ESR (
mm/1
st
hour
), median [IQR]
30.5 [8.7-52.7]
7.0 [3.0-14.0]*
4.5 [2.0-8.0]*
5.0[2.0-6.0]*
4.0 [2.0-9.5]*
Hemoglobin (
g/dL
), mean ± SD
12.4 ±1.5
13.0 ±1.2*
13.0 ±1.4*
13.2 ±1.5*
12.9 ±1.6*
Prednisone dose
, median [IQR]
30.0 [12.5-50.0]
20.0 [10.0-30.0]*
10.0 [5.0-20.0]*
5.0 [5.0-10.5]*
5.0 [0.0-5.6]*
CRP:
C-Reactive Protein;
ESR
: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate;
IQR:
interquartile range; n: number. *p<0.01 vs baseline (Wilcoxon test).
Conclusion:
TCZ is effective and safe in white patients with refractory TAK. A discordance between clinical and imaging activity assessment may exist.
References:
[1]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.
[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507.
[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. PMID: 30655091
Disclosure of Interests:
Diana Prieto-Peña Grant/research support from: DP-P has received research support from UCB Pharma, Roche, Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie and Lilly., Pilar Bernabéu: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Beatriz González-Alvarez: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz: None declared, Esteban Rubio Romero: None declared, SALVADOR GARCÍA MORILLO: None declared, Mauricio Minguez: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Sheila Melchor: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Beatriz Bravo: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Juan Salvatierra: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, C. Romero-Gómez: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Javier Mendizabal: None declared, Francisco Miguel Ortiz Sanjuan: None declared, I. Pérez de Pedro: None declared, JOSE LUIS ALONSO VALDIVIESO: None declared, Pérez Sánchez Laura: None declared, Roldán Molina Rosa: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Ricardo Gómez de la Torre: None declared, Silvia Suarez: None declared, María Jesús Montesa: None declared, Monica Delgado Sanchez: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Belén Atienza-Mateo: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: MAG-G received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: RB received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
DOI: | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1747 |